Propose a change

Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

94E Unauthorised expenditure in excess of targeted expenditure limit

(1) This section applies if— (a) controlled expenditure which is targeted at a particular registered party (“the registered party”) is incurred by or on behalf of a recognised third party (“the third party”), (b) the expenditure exceeds a targeted expenditure limit (to any extent), and (c) at the time the expenditure is incurred— (i) the third party is not authorised by the registered party to incur expenditure targeted at it, or (ii) the third party is so authorised, but the expenditure exceeds a cap specified in the authorisation (to any extent). (2) If the third party is not an individual— (a) the responsible person is guilty of an offence if the person authorised the expenditure to be incurred by or on behalf of the third party and the person knew or ought reasonably to have known that the expenditure would be incurred in excess of the targeted expenditure limit, and (b) the third party is also guilty of an offence. (3) If the third party is an individual, the third party is guilty of an offence if the third party knew or ought reasonably to have known that the expenditure would be incurred in excess of the targeted expenditure limit. (4) It is a defence for a third party charged with an offence under subsection (2) or (3) to show— (a) that any code of practice for the time being issued under paragraph 3 of Schedule 8A was complied with in determining whether any expenditure is controlled expenditure for the purposes of this Part, and (b) that the offence would not have been committed on the basis of the controlled expenditure as determined in accordance with the code.

Your change, as a redline

94E Unauthorised expenditure in excess of targeted expenditure limit

(1) This section applies if— (a) controlled expenditure which is targeted at a particular registered party (“the registered party”) is incurred by or on behalf of a recognised third party (“the third party”), (b) the expenditure exceeds a targeted expenditure limit (to any extent), and (c) at the time the expenditure is incurred— (i) the third party is not authorised by the registered party to incur expenditure targeted at it, or (ii) the third party is so authorised, but the expenditure exceeds a cap specified in the authorisation (to any extent). (2) If the third party is not an individual— (a) the responsible person is guilty of an offence if the person authorised the expenditure to be incurred by or on behalf of the third party and the person knew or ought reasonably to have known that the expenditure would be incurred in excess of the targeted expenditure limit, and (b) the third party is also guilty of an offence. (3) If the third party is an individual, the third party is guilty of an offence if the third party knew or ought reasonably to have known that the expenditure would be incurred in excess of the targeted expenditure limit. (4) It is a defence for a third party charged with an offence under subsection (2) or (3) to show— (a) that any code of practice for the time being issued under paragraph 3 of Schedule 8A was complied with in determining whether any expenditure is controlled expenditure for the purposes of this Part, and (b) that the offence would not have been committed on the basis of the controlled expenditure as determined in accordance with the code.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds