Propose a change

Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

95D Forfeiture

(1) The court may, on an application made by the Commission, order the forfeiture by a recognised third party of an amount equal to the value of a relevant donation where the court is satisfied that— (a) a failure by the responsible person to deliver a quarterly or weekly report in accordance with section 95A(8) or 95B(7), or (b) the delivery by the responsible person of a quarterly or weekly report which fails to comply with a requirement of Schedule 11A, was attributable to an intention on the part of any person to conceal the existence or true amount of the donation. (2) The standard of proof in proceedings on an application under this section is that applicable to civil proceedings. (3) A forfeiture order may be made under this section whether or not proceedings are brought against any person for an offence connected with the donation. (4) In this section “the court” means— (a) in relation to England and Wales, a magistrates' court; (b) in relation to Scotland, the sheriff; (c) in relation to Northern Ireland, a court of summary jurisdiction. (5) Proceedings on an application under this section to the sheriff are civil proceedings. (6) Sections 59 and 60 (appeals etc against forfeiture orders) apply for the purposes, or in connection with the operation, of this section in relation to a recognised third party as they apply for the purposes, or in connection with the operation, of section 58 in relation to a registered party. (7) In this section “relevant donation” has the same meaning as in Schedule 11. (8) This section does not apply in relation to a recognised third party that is subject to the lower-tier expenditure limits.

Your change, as a redline

95D Forfeiture

(1) The court may, on an application made by the Commission, order the forfeiture by a recognised third party of an amount equal to the value of a relevant donation where the court is satisfied that— (a) a failure by the responsible person to deliver a quarterly or weekly report in accordance with section 95A(8) or 95B(7), or (b) the delivery by the responsible person of a quarterly or weekly report which fails to comply with a requirement of Schedule 11A, was attributable to an intention on the part of any person to conceal the existence or true amount of the donation. (2) The standard of proof in proceedings on an application under this section is that applicable to civil proceedings. (3) A forfeiture order may be made under this section whether or not proceedings are brought against any person for an offence connected with the donation. (4) In this section “the court” means— (a) in relation to England and Wales, a magistrates' court; (b) in relation to Scotland, the sheriff; (c) in relation to Northern Ireland, a court of summary jurisdiction. (5) Proceedings on an application under this section to the sheriff are civil proceedings. (6) Sections 59 and 60 (appeals etc against forfeiture orders) apply for the purposes, or in connection with the operation, of this section in relation to a recognised third party as they apply for the purposes, or in connection with the operation, of section 58 in relation to a registered party. (7) In this section “relevant donation” has the same meaning as in Schedule 11. (8) This section does not apply in relation to a recognised third party that is subject to the lower-tier expenditure limits.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds