Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
124 Approval of modifications under section 123 in urgent cases
(1) This section applies where—
(a) a modification is made under section 123 without the approval of a Judicial Commissioner, and
(b) the person who made the modification considered that there was an urgent need to make it.
(2) The person who made the modification must inform a Judicial Commissioner that it has been made.
(3) The Judicial Commissioner must, before the end of the relevant period—
(a) decide whether to approve the decision to make the modification, and
(b) notify the person of the Judicial Commissioner's decision.
“The relevant period” means the period ending with the third working day after the day on which the modification was made.
(4) If the Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve the decision to make the modification—
(a) the person who issued the warrant must be notified of the refusal,
(b) the warrant (unless it no longer has effect) has effect as if the modification had not been made, and
(c) the person to whom the warrant is addressed must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of that modification stops as soon as possible;
and section 108(5) does not apply in relation to the refusal to approve the decision.
(5) In a case where a Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve a decision to make a modification of a targeted equipment interference warrant, the Judicial Commissioner may authorise further interference with equipment for the purpose of enabling the person to whom the warrant is addressed to secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification stops as soon as possible.
(6) If the Judicial Commissioner authorises further interference with equipment under subsection (5), the person who issued the warrant must be informed of the authorisation.
(7) Nothing in this section affects the lawfulness of—
(a) anything done under the warrant by virtue of the modification before the modification ceases to have effect;
(b) if anything is in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification when the modification ceases to have effect—
(i) anything done before that thing could be stopped, or
(ii) anything done which it is not reasonably practicable to stop.
Your change, as a redline
124 Approval of modifications under section 123 in urgent cases
(1) This section applies where—
(a) a modification is made under section 123 without the approval of a Judicial Commissioner, and
(b) the person who made the modification considered that there was an urgent need to make it.
(2) The person who made the modification must inform a Judicial Commissioner that it has been made.
(3) The Judicial Commissioner must, before the end of the relevant period—
(a) decide whether to approve the decision to make the modification, and
(b) notify the person of the Judicial Commissioner's decision.
“The relevant period” means the period ending with the third working day after the day on which the modification was made.
(4) If the Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve the decision to make the modification—
(a) the person who issued the warrant must be notified of the refusal,
(b) the warrant (unless it no longer has effect) has effect as if the modification had not been made, and
(c) the person to whom the warrant is addressed must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of that modification stops as soon as possible;
and section 108(5) does not apply in relation to the refusal to approve the decision.
(5) In a case where a Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve a decision to make a modification of a targeted equipment interference warrant, the Judicial Commissioner may authorise further interference with equipment for the purpose of enabling the person to whom the warrant is addressed to secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification stops as soon as possible.
(6) If the Judicial Commissioner authorises further interference with equipment under subsection (5), the person who issued the warrant must be informed of the authorisation.
(7) Nothing in this section affects the lawfulness of—
(a) anything done under the warrant by virtue of the modification before the modification ceases to have effect;
(b) if anything is in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification when the modification ceases to have effect—
(i) anything done before that thing could be stopped, or
(ii) anything done which it is not reasonably practicable to stop.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.