Propose a change

Investigatory Powers Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

139 Additional requirements in respect of warrants affecting overseas operators

(1) This section applies where— (a) an application for a bulk interception warrant has been made, and (b) the Secretary of State considers that a telecommunications operator outside the United Kingdom is likely to be required to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant if it is issued. (2) Before issuing the warrant, the Secretary of State must consult the operator. (3) Before issuing the warrant, the Secretary of State must, among other matters, take into account— (a) the likely benefits of the warrant, (b) the likely number of users (if known) of any telecommunications service which is provided by the operator and to which the warrant relates, (c) the technical feasibility of complying with any requirement that may be imposed on the operator to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant, (d) the likely cost of complying with any such requirement, and (e) any other effect of the warrant on the operator.

Your change, as a redline

139 Additional requirements in respect of warrants affecting overseas operators

(1) This section applies where— (a) an application for a bulk interception warrant has been made, and (b) the Secretary of State considers that a telecommunications operator outside the United Kingdom is likely to be required to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant if it is issued. (2) Before issuing the warrant, the Secretary of State must consult the operator. (3) Before issuing the warrant, the Secretary of State must, among other matters, take into account— (a) the likely benefits of the warrant, (b) the likely number of users (if known) of any telecommunications service which is provided by the operator and to which the warrant relates, (c) the technical feasibility of complying with any requirement that may be imposed on the operator to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant, (d) the likely cost of complying with any such requirement, and (e) any other effect of the warrant on the operator.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds