Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
152 Safeguards relating to examination of material
(1) For the purposes of section 150 the requirements of this section are met in relation to the intercepted content and secondary data obtained under a warrant if—
(a) the selection of any of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination is carried out only for the specified purposes (see subsection (2)),
(b) the selection of any of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination is necessary and proportionate in all the circumstances, and
(c) the selection of any of the intercepted content for examination meets any of the selection conditions (see subsection (3)).
(2) The selection of intercepted content or secondary data for examination is carried out only for the specified purposes if the intercepted content or secondary data is selected for examination only so far as is necessary for the operational purposes specified in the warrant in accordance with section 142.
In this subsection “specified in the warrant” means specified in the warrant at the time of the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination.
(3) The selection conditions referred to in subsection (1)(c) are—
(a) that the selection of the intercepted content for examination does not breach the prohibition in subsection (4);
(b) that the person to whom the warrant is addressed considers that the selection of the intercepted content for examination would not breach that prohibition;
(c) that the selection of the intercepted content for examination in breach of that prohibition is authorised by subsection (5);
(d) that the selection of the intercepted content for examination in breach of that prohibition is authorised by a targeted examination warrant issued under Chapter 1 of Part 2.
(4) The prohibition referred to in subsection (3)(a) is that intercepted content may not at any time be selected for examination if—
(a) any criteria used for the selection of the intercepted content for examination are referable to an individual known to be in the British Islands at that time, and
(b) the purpose of using those criteria is to identify the content of communications sent by, or intended for, that individual.
It does not matter for the purposes of this subsection whether the identity of the individual is known.
(5) The selection of intercepted content (“the relevant content”) for examination is authorised by this subsection if—
(a) criteria referable to an individual have been, or are being, used for the selection of intercepted content for examination in circumstances falling within subsection (3)(a) or (b),
(b) at any time it appears to the person to whom the warrant is addressed that there has been a relevant change of circumstances in relation to the individual (see subsection (6)) which would mean that the selection of the relevant content for examination would breach the prohibition in subsection (4),
(c) since that time, a written authorisation to examine the relevant content using those criteria has been given by a senior officer, and
(d) the selection of the relevant content for examination is made before the end of the permitted period (see subsection (7)).
(6) For the purposes of subsection (5)(b) there is a relevant change of circumstances in relation to an individual if—
(a) the individual has entered the British Islands, or
(b) a belief by the person to whom the warrant is addressed that the individual was outside the British Islands was in fact mistaken.
(7) In subsection (5)—
“senior officer”, in relation to a warrant addressed to the head of an intelligence service, means a member of the intelligence service who—
is a member of the Senior Civil Service or a member of the Senior Management Structure of Her Majesty's Diplomatic Service, or
holds a position in the intelligence service of equivalent seniority to such a member;
“the permitted period” means the period ending with the fifth working day after the time mentioned in subsection (5)(b).
(8) In a case where the selection of intercepted content for examination is authorised by subsection (5), the person to whom the warrant is addressed must notify the Secretary of State that the selection is being carried out.
Your change, as a redline
152 Safeguards relating to examination of material
(1) For the purposes of section 150 the requirements of this section are met in relation to the intercepted content and secondary data obtained under a warrant if—
(a) the selection of any of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination is carried out only for the specified purposes (see subsection (2)),
(b) the selection of any of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination is necessary and proportionate in all the circumstances, and
(c) the selection of any of the intercepted content for examination meets any of the selection conditions (see subsection (3)).
(2) The selection of intercepted content or secondary data for examination is carried out only for the specified purposes if the intercepted content or secondary data is selected for examination only so far as is necessary for the operational purposes specified in the warrant in accordance with section 142.
In this subsection “specified in the warrant” means specified in the warrant at the time of the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination.
(3) The selection conditions referred to in subsection (1)(c) are—
(a) that the selection of the intercepted content for examination does not breach the prohibition in subsection (4);
(b) that the person to whom the warrant is addressed considers that the selection of the intercepted content for examination would not breach that prohibition;
(c) that the selection of the intercepted content for examination in breach of that prohibition is authorised by subsection (5);
(d) that the selection of the intercepted content for examination in breach of that prohibition is authorised by a targeted examination warrant issued under Chapter 1 of Part 2.
(4) The prohibition referred to in subsection (3)(a) is that intercepted content may not at any time be selected for examination if—
(a) any criteria used for the selection of the intercepted content for examination are referable to an individual known to be in the British Islands at that time, and
(b) the purpose of using those criteria is to identify the content of communications sent by, or intended for, that individual.
It does not matter for the purposes of this subsection whether the identity of the individual is known.
(5) The selection of intercepted content (“the relevant content”) for examination is authorised by this subsection if—
(a) criteria referable to an individual have been, or are being, used for the selection of intercepted content for examination in circumstances falling within subsection (3)(a) or (b),
(b) at any time it appears to the person to whom the warrant is addressed that there has been a relevant change of circumstances in relation to the individual (see subsection (6)) which would mean that the selection of the relevant content for examination would breach the prohibition in subsection (4),
(c) since that time, a written authorisation to examine the relevant content using those criteria has been given by a senior officer, and
(d) the selection of the relevant content for examination is made before the end of the permitted period (see subsection (7)).
(6) For the purposes of subsection (5)(b) there is a relevant change of circumstances in relation to an individual if—
(a) the individual has entered the British Islands, or
(b) a belief by the person to whom the warrant is addressed that the individual was outside the British Islands was in fact mistaken.
(7) In subsection (5)—
“senior officer”, in relation to a warrant addressed to the head of an intelligence service, means a member of the intelligence service who—
is a member of the Senior Civil Service or a member of the Senior Management Structure of Her Majesty's Diplomatic Service, or
holds a position in the intelligence service of equivalent seniority to such a member;
“the permitted period” means the period ending with the fifth working day after the time mentioned in subsection (5)(b).
(8) In a case where the selection of intercepted content for examination is authorised by subsection (5), the person to whom the warrant is addressed must notify the Secretary of State that the selection is being carried out.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.