Propose a change

Investigatory Powers Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

154A Section 154: procedure where use of criteria approved by senior official

(1) This section applies where intercepted content or secondary data is selected for examination using criteria the use of which was approved by a senior official under section 154(2). (2) The Secretary of State must, as soon as reasonably practicable, inform the Investigatory Powers Commissioner that the approval has been given. (3) The Investigatory Powers Commissioner must, as soon as reasonably practicable— (a) consider whether the relevant condition is met as regards the use of the criteria for the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination, and (b) notify the Secretary of State of their decision. (4) For this purpose, “the relevant condition” is that— (a) the public interest in obtaining the information that would be obtained by the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination outweighs the public interest in the confidentiality of confidential journalistic material or sources of journalistic information, and (b) there are no less intrusive means by which the information may reasonably be obtained. (5) On the giving of a notification of a decision that the relevant condition is not met, the senior official’s approval ceases to have effect. (6) Nothing in subsection (5) affects the lawfulness of— (a) anything done by virtue of the approval before it ceases to have effect, or (b) if anything is in the process of being done by virtue of the approval when it ceases to have effect— (i) anything done before that thing could be stopped, or (ii) anything done which it is not reasonably practicable to stop.

Your change, as a redline

154A Section 154: procedure where use of criteria approved by senior official

(1) This section applies where intercepted content or secondary data is selected for examination using criteria the use of which was approved by a senior official under section 154(2). (2) The Secretary of State must, as soon as reasonably practicable, inform the Investigatory Powers Commissioner that the approval has been given. (3) The Investigatory Powers Commissioner must, as soon as reasonably practicable— (a) consider whether the relevant condition is met as regards the use of the criteria for the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination, and (b) notify the Secretary of State of their decision. (4) For this purpose, “the relevant condition” is that— (a) the public interest in obtaining the information that would be obtained by the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination outweighs the public interest in the confidentiality of confidential journalistic material or sources of journalistic information, and (b) there are no less intrusive means by which the information may reasonably be obtained. (5) On the giving of a notification of a decision that the relevant condition is not met, the senior official’s approval ceases to have effect. (6) Nothing in subsection (5) affects the lawfulness of— (a) anything done by virtue of the approval before it ceases to have effect, or (b) if anything is in the process of being done by virtue of the approval when it ceases to have effect— (i) anything done before that thing could be stopped, or (ii) anything done which it is not reasonably practicable to stop.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds