Propose a change

Investigatory Powers Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

17 Subject-matter of warrants

(1) A warrant under this Chapter may relate to— (a) a particular person or organisation, or (b) a single set of premises. (2) In addition, a targeted interception warrant or targeted examination warrant may relate to— (a) a group of persons who share a common purpose or who carry on, or may carry on, a particular activity; (b) more than one person or organisation, or more than one set of premises, where the conduct authorised or required by the warrant is for the purposes of a single investigation or operation; (c) testing or training activities. (3) In subsection (2)(c) “testing or training activities” means— (a) in relation to a targeted interception warrant— (i) the testing, maintenance or development of apparatus, systems or other capabilities relating to the interception of communications in the course of their transmission by means of a telecommunication system or to the obtaining of secondary data from communications transmitted by means of such a system, or (ii) the training of persons who carry out, or are likely to carry out, such interception or the obtaining of such data; (b) in relation to a targeted examination warrant— (i) the testing, maintenance or development of apparatus, systems or other capabilities relating to the selection of relevant content for examination, or (ii) the training of persons who carry out, or are likely to carry out, the selection of relevant content for examination.

Your change, as a redline

17 Subject-matter of warrants

(1) A warrant under this Chapter may relate to— (a) a particular person or organisation, or (b) a single set of premises. (2) In addition, a targeted interception warrant or targeted examination warrant may relate to— (a) a group of persons who share a common purpose or who carry on, or may carry on, a particular activity; (b) more than one person or organisation, or more than one set of premises, where the conduct authorised or required by the warrant is for the purposes of a single investigation or operation; (c) testing or training activities. (3) In subsection (2)(c) “testing or training activities” means— (a) in relation to a targeted interception warrant— (i) the testing, maintenance or development of apparatus, systems or other capabilities relating to the interception of communications in the course of their transmission by means of a telecommunication system or to the obtaining of secondary data from communications transmitted by means of such a system, or (ii) the training of persons who carry out, or are likely to carry out, such interception or the obtaining of such data; (b) in relation to a targeted examination warrant— (i) the testing, maintenance or development of apparatus, systems or other capabilities relating to the selection of relevant content for examination, or (ii) the training of persons who carry out, or are likely to carry out, the selection of relevant content for examination.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds