Propose a change

Investigatory Powers Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

226BC Approval of individual authorisations granted in urgent cases

(1) This section applies where— (a) an individual authorisation is granted without the approval of a Judicial Commissioner, and (b) the person who granted the authorisation considered that there was an urgent need to grant it. (2) The person who granted the authorisation must inform a Judicial Commissioner that it has been granted. (3) The Judicial Commissioner must, before the end of the relevant period— (a) decide whether to approve the decision to grant the authorisation, and (b) notify the person who granted the authorisation of the Judicial Commissioner’s decision. The “relevant period” means the period ending with the third working day after the day on which the authorisation was granted. (4) Subsections (5) to (7) apply if a Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve the decision to grant an individual authorisation. (5) The authorisation— (a) ceases to have effect (unless already cancelled), and (b) may not be renewed, and section 226BB(4) does not apply in relation to the refusal to approve the decision. (6) The head of the intelligence service must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done in reliance on the authorisation stops as soon as possible. (7) Section 220 (Part 7 initial examinations: time limits) applies in relation to the bulk personal dataset described in the authorisation as if the intelligence service had obtained that dataset at the time when the person who granted the authorisation is notified that the Judicial Commissioner has refused to approve the decision to grant the authorisation. (8) Nothing in subsection (5) or (6) affects the lawfulness of— (a) anything done in reliance on the authorisation before it ceases to have effect; (b) if anything is in the process of being done in reliance on the authorisation when it ceases to have effect— (i) anything done before that thing could be stopped, or (ii) anything done that it is not reasonably practicable to stop.

Your change, as a redline

226BC Approval of individual authorisations granted in urgent cases

(1) This section applies where— (a) an individual authorisation is granted without the approval of a Judicial Commissioner, and (b) the person who granted the authorisation considered that there was an urgent need to grant it. (2) The person who granted the authorisation must inform a Judicial Commissioner that it has been granted. (3) The Judicial Commissioner must, before the end of the relevant period— (a) decide whether to approve the decision to grant the authorisation, and (b) notify the person who granted the authorisation of the Judicial Commissioner’s decision. The “relevant period” means the period ending with the third working day after the day on which the authorisation was granted. (4) Subsections (5) to (7) apply if a Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve the decision to grant an individual authorisation. (5) The authorisation— (a) ceases to have effect (unless already cancelled), and (b) may not be renewed, and section 226BB(4) does not apply in relation to the refusal to approve the decision. (6) The head of the intelligence service must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done in reliance on the authorisation stops as soon as possible. (7) Section 220 (Part 7 initial examinations: time limits) applies in relation to the bulk personal dataset described in the authorisation as if the intelligence service had obtained that dataset at the time when the person who granted the authorisation is notified that the Judicial Commissioner has refused to approve the decision to grant the authorisation. (8) Nothing in subsection (5) or (6) affects the lawfulness of— (a) anything done in reliance on the authorisation before it ceases to have effect; (b) if anything is in the process of being done in reliance on the authorisation when it ceases to have effect— (i) anything done before that thing could be stopped, or (ii) anything done that it is not reasonably practicable to stop.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds