Propose a change

Investigatory Powers Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

226E Third party bulk personal datasets: interpretation

(1) For the purposes of this Part, an intelligence service examines a third party bulk personal dataset if— (a) the intelligence service has relevant access, whether on payment or otherwise, to a set of information that is held electronically by a person other than an intelligence service, (b) the set includes personal data relating to a number of individuals, (c) the nature of the set is such that the majority of the individuals are not, and are unlikely to become, of interest to the intelligence service in the exercise of its functions, and (d) after any initial inspection of the contents (see section 226I), the intelligence service examines the set electronically (but does not obtain the set) for the purpose of the exercise of its functions. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), an intelligence service has “relevant access” to a set of information that is held electronically by another person where— (a) the access is made available to the intelligence service as a result of arrangements made directly between the intelligence service and that other person, (b) the type and extent of the access available to the intelligence service is not generally available (whether on a commercial basis or otherwise), and (c) the access is electronic.

Your change, as a redline

226E Third party bulk personal datasets: interpretation

(1) For the purposes of this Part, an intelligence service examines a third party bulk personal dataset if— (a) the intelligence service has relevant access, whether on payment or otherwise, to a set of information that is held electronically by a person other than an intelligence service, (b) the set includes personal data relating to a number of individuals, (c) the nature of the set is such that the majority of the individuals are not, and are unlikely to become, of interest to the intelligence service in the exercise of its functions, and (d) after any initial inspection of the contents (see section 226I), the intelligence service examines the set electronically (but does not obtain the set) for the purpose of the exercise of its functions. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), an intelligence service has “relevant access” to a set of information that is held electronically by another person where— (a) the access is made available to the intelligence service as a result of arrangements made directly between the intelligence service and that other person, (b) the type and extent of the access available to the intelligence service is not generally available (whether on a commercial basis or otherwise), and (c) the access is electronic.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds