Propose a change

Investigatory Powers Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

50 Interception in psychiatric hospitals etc.

(1) Conduct is authorised by this section if— (a) it takes place in any hospital premises where high security psychiatric services are provided, and (b) it is conduct in pursuance of, and in accordance with, any relevant direction given to the body providing those services at those premises. (2) “Relevant direction” means— (a) a direction under section 4(3A)(a) of the National Health Service Act 2006, or (b) a direction under section 19 or 23 of the National Health Service (Wales) Act 2006. (3) Conduct is authorised by this section if— (a) it takes place in a state hospital, and (b) it is conduct in pursuance of, and in accordance with, any direction given to the State Hospitals Board for Scotland under section 2(5) of the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978 (regulations and directions as to the exercise of their functions by health boards). The reference to section 2(5) of that Act is to that provision as applied by Article 5(1) of, and the Schedule to, the State Hospitals Board for Scotland Order 1995 (which applies certain provisions of that Act to the State Hospitals Board). (4) Conduct is authorised by this section if it is conduct in exercise of any power conferred by or under— (a) section 281 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 (2003 asp 13) (power to withhold correspondence of certain persons detained in hospital), or (b) section 284 of that Act (powers relating to the use of telephones by certain persons detained in hospital). (5) In this section— “high security psychiatric services” has the same meaning as in section 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006; “hospital premises” has the same meaning as in section 4(3) of that Act; “state hospital” has the same meaning as in the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978.

Your change, as a redline

50 Interception in psychiatric hospitals etc.

(1) Conduct is authorised by this section if— (a) it takes place in any hospital premises where high security psychiatric services are provided, and (b) it is conduct in pursuance of, and in accordance with, any relevant direction given to the body providing those services at those premises. (2) “Relevant direction” means— (a) a direction under section 4(3A)(a) of the National Health Service Act 2006, or (b) a direction under section 19 or 23 of the National Health Service (Wales) Act 2006. (3) Conduct is authorised by this section if— (a) it takes place in a state hospital, and (b) it is conduct in pursuance of, and in accordance with, any direction given to the State Hospitals Board for Scotland under section 2(5) of the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978 (regulations and directions as to the exercise of their functions by health boards). The reference to section 2(5) of that Act is to that provision as applied by Article 5(1) of, and the Schedule to, the State Hospitals Board for Scotland Order 1995 (which applies certain provisions of that Act to the State Hospitals Board). (4) Conduct is authorised by this section if it is conduct in exercise of any power conferred by or under— (a) section 281 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 (2003 asp 13) (power to withhold correspondence of certain persons detained in hospital), or (b) section 284 of that Act (powers relating to the use of telephones by certain persons detained in hospital). (5) In this section— “high security psychiatric services” has the same meaning as in section 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006; “hospital premises” has the same meaning as in section 4(3) of that Act; “state hospital” has the same meaning as in the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds