Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
52 Interception in accordance with overseas requests
(1) The interception of a communication in the course of its transmission by means of a telecommunication system is authorised by this section if conditions A to D are met.
(2) Condition A is that the interception—
(a) is carried out by or on behalf of a telecommunications operator, and
(b) relates to the use of a telecommunications service provided by the telecommunications operator.
(3) Condition B is that the interception is carried out in response to a request made in accordance with a relevant international agreement by the competent authorities of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom.
In this subsection “relevant international agreement” means an international agreement to which the United Kingdom is a party and which is designated as a relevant international agreement by regulations made by the Secretary of State (see further subsections (6) and (7)).
(4) Condition C is that the interception is carried out for the purpose of obtaining information about the communications of an individual—
(a) who is outside the United Kingdom, or
(b) who each of the following persons believes is outside the United Kingdom—
(i) the person making the request;
(ii) the person carrying out the interception.
(5) Condition D is that any further conditions specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this section are met.
(6) Subsection (7) applies where an international agreement provides for requests for the interception of a communication to be made by the competent authorities of a country or territory, or of more than one country or territory, in which a person found guilty of a criminal offence may be sentenced to death for the offence under the general criminal law of the country or territory concerned.
Such an offence is referred to in subsection (7) as a “death penalty offence”.
(7) Where this subsection applies, the Secretary of State may not designate the agreement as a relevant international agreement unless the Secretary of State has sought, in respect of each country or territory referred to in subsection (6), a written assurance, or written assurances, relating to the non-use of information obtained by virtue of the agreement in connection with proceedings for a death penalty offence in the country or territory.
Your change, as a redline
52 Interception in accordance with overseas requests
(1) The interception of a communication in the course of its transmission by means of a telecommunication system is authorised by this section if conditions A to D are met.
(2) Condition A is that the interception—
(a) is carried out by or on behalf of a telecommunications operator, and
(b) relates to the use of a telecommunications service provided by the telecommunications operator.
(3) Condition B is that the interception is carried out in response to a request made in accordance with a relevant international agreement by the competent authorities of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom.
In this subsection “relevant international agreement” means an international agreement to which the United Kingdom is a party and which is designated as a relevant international agreement by regulations made by the Secretary of State (see further subsections (6) and (7)).
(4) Condition C is that the interception is carried out for the purpose of obtaining information about the communications of an individual—
(a) who is outside the United Kingdom, or
(b) who each of the following persons believes is outside the United Kingdom—
(i) the person making the request;
(ii) the person carrying out the interception.
(5) Condition D is that any further conditions specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this section are met.
(6) Subsection (7) applies where an international agreement provides for requests for the interception of a communication to be made by the competent authorities of a country or territory, or of more than one country or territory, in which a person found guilty of a criminal offence may be sentenced to death for the offence under the general criminal law of the country or territory concerned.
Such an offence is referred to in subsection (7) as a “death penalty offence”.
(7) Where this subsection applies, the Secretary of State may not designate the agreement as a relevant international agreement unless the Secretary of State has sought, in respect of each country or territory referred to in subsection (6), a written assurance, or written assurances, relating to the non-use of information obtained by virtue of the agreement in connection with proceedings for a death penalty offence in the country or territory.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.