Propose a change

Investigatory Powers Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

63 Additional restrictions on grant of authorisations under section 61

(1) A designated senior officer may not grant an authorisation under section 61 for the purposes of a specific investigation or a specific operation if the officer is working on that investigation or operation. (2) But, if the designated senior officer considers that there are exceptional circumstances which mean that subsection (1) should not apply in a particular case, that subsection does not apply in that case. (3) Examples of exceptional circumstances include— (a) an imminent threat to life or another emergency, (b) the investigation or operation concerned is one where there is an exceptional need, in the interests of national security, to keep knowledge of it to a minimum, or (c) there is an opportunity to obtain information where— (i) the opportunity is rare, (ii) the time to act is short, and (iii) the need to obtain the information is significant and in the interests of national security. (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your change, as a redline

63 Additional restrictions on grant of authorisations under section 61

(1) A designated senior officer may not grant an authorisation under section 61 for the purposes of a specific investigation or a specific operation if the officer is working on that investigation or operation. (2) But, if the designated senior officer considers that there are exceptional circumstances which mean that subsection (1) should not apply in a particular case, that subsection does not apply in that case. (3) Examples of exceptional circumstances include— (a) an imminent threat to life or another emergency, (b) the investigation or operation concerned is one where there is an exceptional need, in the interests of national security, to keep knowledge of it to a minimum, or (c) there is an opportunity to obtain information where— (i) the opportunity is rare, (ii) the time to act is short, and (iii) the need to obtain the information is significant and in the interests of national security. (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds