Propose a change

Investigatory Powers Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

64 Procedure for authorisations and authorised notices

(1) An authorisation must specify— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (aa) whether the authorisation has been granted by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner under section 60A or by a designated senior officer under section 61 or 61A; (b) the matters falling within section 60A(7), 61(7) or 61A(7) (as applicable) by reference to which it is granted, (c) the conduct that is authorised, (d) the data or description of data to be obtained, and (e) the persons or descriptions of persons to whom the data is to be, or may be, disclosed or how to identify such persons. (1A) An authorisation granted by a designated senior officer under section 61 or 61A must also specify the office, rank or position held by the officer. (2) An authorisation which authorises a person to impose requirements by notice on a telecommunications operator must also specify— (a) the operator concerned, and (b) the nature of the requirements that are to be imposed, but need not specify the other contents of the notice. (3) The notice itself— (a) must specify— (i) the office, rank or position held by the person giving it, (ii) the requirements that are being imposed, and (iii) the telecommunications operator on whom the requirements are being imposed, and (b) must be given in writing or (if not in writing) in a manner that produces a record of its having been given. (4) An authorisation must be applied for, and granted, in writing or (if not in writing) in a manner that produces a record of its having been applied for or granted.

Your change, as a redline

64 Procedure for authorisations and authorised notices

(1) An authorisation must specify— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (aa) whether the authorisation has been granted by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner under section 60A or by a designated senior officer under section 61 or 61A; (b) the matters falling within section 60A(7), 61(7) or 61A(7) (as applicable) by reference to which it is granted, (c) the conduct that is authorised, (d) the data or description of data to be obtained, and (e) the persons or descriptions of persons to whom the data is to be, or may be, disclosed or how to identify such persons. (1A) An authorisation granted by a designated senior officer under section 61 or 61A must also specify the office, rank or position held by the officer. (2) An authorisation which authorises a person to impose requirements by notice on a telecommunications operator must also specify— (a) the operator concerned, and (b) the nature of the requirements that are to be imposed, but need not specify the other contents of the notice. (3) The notice itself— (a) must specify— (i) the office, rank or position held by the person giving it, (ii) the requirements that are being imposed, and (iii) the telecommunications operator on whom the requirements are being imposed, and (b) must be given in writing or (if not in writing) in a manner that produces a record of its having been given. (4) An authorisation must be applied for, and granted, in writing or (if not in writing) in a manner that produces a record of its having been applied for or granted.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds