Propose a change

Investigatory Powers Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

81 Lawfulness of conduct authorised by this Part

(1) Conduct is lawful for all purposes if— (a) it is conduct in which any person is authorised to engage by an authorisation or required to undertake by virtue of a notice given in pursuance of an authorisation, and (b) the conduct is in accordance with, or in pursuance of, the authorisation or notice. (2) A person (whether or not the person so authorised or required) is not to be subject to any civil liability in respect of conduct that— (a) is incidental to, or is reasonably undertaken in connection with, conduct that is lawful by virtue of subsection (1), and (b) is not itself conduct for which an authorisation or warrant— (i) is capable of being granted under any of the enactments mentioned in subsection (3), and (ii) might reasonably have been expected to have been sought in the case in question. (3) The enactments referred to in subsection (2)(b)(i) are— (a) an enactment contained in this Act, (b) an enactment contained in the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, (c) an enactment contained in Part 3 of the Police Act 1997 (powers of the police and of customs officers), or (d) section 5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994 (warrants for the intelligence services).

Your change, as a redline

81 Lawfulness of conduct authorised by this Part

(1) Conduct is lawful for all purposes if— (a) it is conduct in which any person is authorised to engage by an authorisation or required to undertake by virtue of a notice given in pursuance of an authorisation, and (b) the conduct is in accordance with, or in pursuance of, the authorisation or notice. (2) A person (whether or not the person so authorised or required) is not to be subject to any civil liability in respect of conduct that— (a) is incidental to, or is reasonably undertaken in connection with, conduct that is lawful by virtue of subsection (1), and (b) is not itself conduct for which an authorisation or warrant— (i) is capable of being granted under any of the enactments mentioned in subsection (3), and (ii) might reasonably have been expected to have been sought in the case in question. (3) The enactments referred to in subsection (2)(b)(i) are— (a) an enactment contained in this Act, (b) an enactment contained in the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, (c) an enactment contained in Part 3 of the Police Act 1997 (powers of the police and of customs officers), or (d) section 5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994 (warrants for the intelligence services).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds