Propose a change

Juries Act 1974

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

20E Offence of disclosing jury's deliberations: initial exceptions

(1) It is not an offence under section 20D for a person to disclose information in the proceedings mentioned in section 20D(1) for the purposes of enabling the jury to arrive at their verdict or in connection with the delivery of that verdict. (2) It is not an offence under section 20D for the judge dealing with those proceedings to disclose information— (a) for the purposes of dealing with the case, or (b) for the purposes of an investigation by a relevant investigator into whether an offence or contempt of court has been committed by or in relation to a juror in the proceedings mentioned in section 20D(1). (3) It is not an offence under section 20D for a person who reasonably believes that a disclosure described in subsection (2)(b) has been made to disclose information for the purposes of the investigation. (4) It is not an offence under section 20D to publish information disclosed as described in subsection (1) or (2)(a) in the proceedings mentioned in section 20D(1). (5) In this section— “publish” means make available to the public or a section of the public; “relevant investigator” means— a police force; the Attorney General; any other person or class of person specified by the Lord Chancellor for the purposes of this section by regulations made by statutory instrument. (6) The Lord Chancellor must obtain the consent of the Lord Chief Justice before making regulations under this section. (7) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.

Your change, as a redline

20E Offence of disclosing jury's deliberations: initial exceptions

(1) It is not an offence under section 20D for a person to disclose information in the proceedings mentioned in section 20D(1) for the purposes of enabling the jury to arrive at their verdict or in connection with the delivery of that verdict. (2) It is not an offence under section 20D for the judge dealing with those proceedings to disclose information— (a) for the purposes of dealing with the case, or (b) for the purposes of an investigation by a relevant investigator into whether an offence or contempt of court has been committed by or in relation to a juror in the proceedings mentioned in section 20D(1). (3) It is not an offence under section 20D for a person who reasonably believes that a disclosure described in subsection (2)(b) has been made to disclose information for the purposes of the investigation. (4) It is not an offence under section 20D to publish information disclosed as described in subsection (1) or (2)(a) in the proceedings mentioned in section 20D(1). (5) In this section— “publish” means make available to the public or a section of the public; “relevant investigator” means— a police force; the Attorney General; any other person or class of person specified by the Lord Chancellor for the purposes of this section by regulations made by statutory instrument. (6) The Lord Chancellor must obtain the consent of the Lord Chief Justice before making regulations under this section. (7) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds