Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
51C Surrender, seizure and retention of knives and other articles
(1) If a Supreme Court security officer acting in the execution of the officer's duty reasonably believes that an article in the possession of a person who is in, or seeking to enter, a court building ought to be surrendered on any of the grounds given in subsection (2), the officer must ask the person to surrender the article; and, if the person refuses to surrender the article, the officer may seize it.
(2) The grounds are that the article—
(a) may jeopardise the maintenance of order in the court building (or a part of it),
(b) may put the safety of any person in the court building at risk, or
(c) may be evidence of, or in relation to, an offence.
(3) Subject to subsection (4), a Supreme Court security officer may retain an article which was—
(a) surrendered in response to a request under subsection (1), or
(b) seized under that subsection,
until the time when the person who surrendered it, or from whom it was seized, is leaving the court building.
(4) If a Supreme Court security officer reasonably believes that the article may be evidence of, or in relation to, an offence, the officer may retain it until—
(a) the time when the person who surrendered it, or from whom it was seized, is leaving the court building, or
(b) the end of the permitted period,
whichever is the later.
(5) In subsection (4) “the permitted period” means such period, not exceeding 24 hours from the time the article was surrendered or seized, as will enable the Supreme Court security officer to draw the article to the attention of a constable.
(6) Subsections (3) to (5) do not apply where a knife is—
(a) surrendered to a Supreme Court security officer in response to a request under subsection (1), or
(b) seized by a Supreme Court security officer under that subsection,
but, instead, the knife must be retained in accordance with regulations under section 51D(3) unless returned or disposed of in accordance with those regulations or regulations under section 51D(1).
(7) If a Supreme Court security officer reasonably believes that a retained knife may be evidence of, or in relation to, an offence, nothing in subsection (6) prevents the officer retaining the knife for so long as necessary to enable the officer to draw it to the attention of a constable.
(8) In this section “knife” includes—
(a) a knife-blade, and
(b) any other article which—
(i) has a blade or is sharply pointed, and
(ii) is made or adapted for use for causing injury to the person.
Your change, as a redline
51C Surrender, seizure and retention of knives and other articles
(1) If a Supreme Court security officer acting in the execution of the officer's duty reasonably believes that an article in the possession of a person who is in, or seeking to enter, a court building ought to be surrendered on any of the grounds given in subsection (2), the officer must ask the person to surrender the article; and, if the person refuses to surrender the article, the officer may seize it.
(2) The grounds are that the article—
(a) may jeopardise the maintenance of order in the court building (or a part of it),
(b) may put the safety of any person in the court building at risk, or
(c) may be evidence of, or in relation to, an offence.
(3) Subject to subsection (4), a Supreme Court security officer may retain an article which was—
(a) surrendered in response to a request under subsection (1), or
(b) seized under that subsection,
until the time when the person who surrendered it, or from whom it was seized, is leaving the court building.
(4) If a Supreme Court security officer reasonably believes that the article may be evidence of, or in relation to, an offence, the officer may retain it until—
(a) the time when the person who surrendered it, or from whom it was seized, is leaving the court building, or
(b) the end of the permitted period,
whichever is the later.
(5) In subsection (4) “the permitted period” means such period, not exceeding 24 hours from the time the article was surrendered or seized, as will enable the Supreme Court security officer to draw the article to the attention of a constable.
(6) Subsections (3) to (5) do not apply where a knife is—
(a) surrendered to a Supreme Court security officer in response to a request under subsection (1), or
(b) seized by a Supreme Court security officer under that subsection,
but, instead, the knife must be retained in accordance with regulations under section 51D(3) unless returned or disposed of in accordance with those regulations or regulations under section 51D(1).
(7) If a Supreme Court security officer reasonably believes that a retained knife may be evidence of, or in relation to, an offence, nothing in subsection (6) prevents the officer retaining the knife for so long as necessary to enable the officer to draw it to the attention of a constable.
(8) In this section “knife” includes—
(a) a knife-blade, and
(b) any other article which—
(i) has a blade or is sharply pointed, and
(ii) is made or adapted for use for causing injury to the person.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.