Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
99 Complaints: interpretation
(1) This section applies for the purposes of this Part.
(2) A Commission complaint is a complaint by a qualifying complainant of maladministration by the Commission or a committee of the Commission.
(3) A departmental complaint is a complaint by a qualifying complainant of maladministration by the Lord Chancellor or his department in connection with any of the following—
(a) selection under this Part;
(b) recommendation for or appointment to an office listed in Schedule 14.
(3A) An LCJ complaint is a complaint by a qualifying complainant of maladministration by the Lord Chief Justice or the Lord Chief Justice's nominee, or anyone acting on behalf of either of them, in connection with—
(a) selection under this Part for an office listed in Table 2 of Part 1 or 2 of Schedule 14,
(b) appointment to an office listed in Table 2 of Part 2 of that Schedule, or
(c) selection under this Part for membership of a pool for requests under section 9(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981,
or of maladministration by the Lord Chief Justice or the Master of the Rolls or the Lord Chief Justice's nominee, or anyone acting on behalf of any of them, in connection with the making of requests under section 9(1) of that Act.
(3B) An SPT complaint is a complaint by a qualifying complainant of maladministration by the Senior President of Tribunals or a person to whom the Senior President has delegated functions, or anyone acting on behalf of either of them, in connection with—
(a) selection under this Part for an office listed in Table 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 14 or in Table 2 of Part 3 of that Schedule, or
(b) appointment to an office listed in Table 2 of Part 3 of that Schedule.
(4) A qualifying complainant is a complainant who claims to have been adversely affected, as an applicant for selection or as a person selected under this Part, by the maladministration complained of.
Your change, as a redline
99 Complaints: interpretation
(1) This section applies for the purposes of this Part.
(2) A Commission complaint is a complaint by a qualifying complainant of maladministration by the Commission or a committee of the Commission.
(3) A departmental complaint is a complaint by a qualifying complainant of maladministration by the Lord Chancellor or his department in connection with any of the following—
(a) selection under this Part;
(b) recommendation for or appointment to an office listed in Schedule 14.
(3A) An LCJ complaint is a complaint by a qualifying complainant of maladministration by the Lord Chief Justice or the Lord Chief Justice's nominee, or anyone acting on behalf of either of them, in connection with—
(a) selection under this Part for an office listed in Table 2 of Part 1 or 2 of Schedule 14,
(b) appointment to an office listed in Table 2 of Part 2 of that Schedule, or
(c) selection under this Part for membership of a pool for requests under section 9(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981,
or of maladministration by the Lord Chief Justice or the Master of the Rolls or the Lord Chief Justice's nominee, or anyone acting on behalf of any of them, in connection with the making of requests under section 9(1) of that Act.
(3B) An SPT complaint is a complaint by a qualifying complainant of maladministration by the Senior President of Tribunals or a person to whom the Senior President has delegated functions, or anyone acting on behalf of either of them, in connection with—
(a) selection under this Part for an office listed in Table 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 14 or in Table 2 of Part 3 of that Schedule, or
(b) appointment to an office listed in Table 2 of Part 3 of that Schedule.
(4) A qualifying complainant is a complainant who claims to have been adversely affected, as an applicant for selection or as a person selected under this Part, by the maladministration complained of.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.