Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
77G Liabilities for assessments made after exemption certificate cancelled
(1) Subsection (7) applies if—
(a) each of conditions A to C is met, and
(b) one of conditions D and E is met.
(2) Condition A is that, after the cancellation under section 77F(3) of a certificate issued under section 77F(2) to a person (“H”) who is the holder of a licence, tax related to the licence is assessed on the applicant for the certificate.
(3) Condition B is that the tax is assessed in reliance on—
(a) section 276 of the 1992 Act,
(b) section 874 of ITTOIA 2005, or
(c) section 1313 of CTA 2009.
(4) Condition C is that the tax assessed is not tax under ITEPA 2003.
(5) Condition D is that—
(a) ignoring section 77F, H could be required by a secondary-liability notice to pay all of the tax remaining unpaid under the assessment, and
(b) the profits or chargeable gains in respect of which the assessment is made include (but are not limited to) profits arising, or chargeable gains accruing, while the certificate is in force.
(6) Condition E is that—
(a) as a result of section 77C(3), but ignoring section 77F, H could be required by a secondary-liability notice to pay some, but not all, of the tax remaining unpaid under the assessment, and
(b) the profits or chargeable gains that are—
(i) ones in respect of which the assessment is made, and
(ii) related to the licence,
include (but are not limited to) profits arising, or chargeable gains accruing, while the certificate is in force.
(7) If this subsection applies then, for the purposes of section 77C(1), the amount for which the holder of the licence is liable is the amount given by—
A×(1—CIFCIF+NIF)
together with a corresponding proportion of any interest due under sections 86 and 87A on the amount remaining unpaid.
(8) In subsection (7)—
A is the amount that H could be required to pay as mentioned in paragraph (a) of whichever of conditions D and E is met (“the operative condition”),
CIF is the amount of the profits or chargeable gains mentioned in paragraph (b) of the operative condition that are ones arising, or accruing, while the certificate is in force, and
NIF is the amount of the profits or chargeable gains mentioned in paragraph (b) of the operative condition that are ones arising, or accruing, while the certificate is not in force.
Your change, as a redline
77G Liabilities for assessments made after exemption certificate cancelled
(1) Subsection (7) applies if—
(a) each of conditions A to C is met, and
(b) one of conditions D and E is met.
(2) Condition A is that, after the cancellation under section 77F(3) of a certificate issued under section 77F(2) to a person (“H”) who is the holder of a licence, tax related to the licence is assessed on the applicant for the certificate.
(3) Condition B is that the tax is assessed in reliance on—
(a) section 276 of the 1992 Act,
(b) section 874 of ITTOIA 2005, or
(c) section 1313 of CTA 2009.
(4) Condition C is that the tax assessed is not tax under ITEPA 2003.
(5) Condition D is that—
(a) ignoring section 77F, H could be required by a secondary-liability notice to pay all of the tax remaining unpaid under the assessment, and
(b) the profits or chargeable gains in respect of which the assessment is made include (but are not limited to) profits arising, or chargeable gains accruing, while the certificate is in force.
(6) Condition E is that—
(a) as a result of section 77C(3), but ignoring section 77F, H could be required by a secondary-liability notice to pay some, but not all, of the tax remaining unpaid under the assessment, and
(b) the profits or chargeable gains that are—
(i) ones in respect of which the assessment is made, and
(ii) related to the licence,
include (but are not limited to) profits arising, or chargeable gains accruing, while the certificate is in force.
(7) If this subsection applies then, for the purposes of section 77C(1), the amount for which the holder of the licence is liable is the amount given by—
A×(1—CIFCIF+NIF)
together with a corresponding proportion of any interest due under sections 86 and 87A on the amount remaining unpaid.
(8) In subsection (7)—
A is the amount that H could be required to pay as mentioned in paragraph (a) of whichever of conditions D and E is met (“the operative condition”),
CIF is the amount of the profits or chargeable gains mentioned in paragraph (b) of the operative condition that are ones arising, or accruing, while the certificate is in force, and
NIF is the amount of the profits or chargeable gains mentioned in paragraph (b) of the operative condition that are ones arising, or accruing, while the certificate is not in force.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.