The Legal Services Act 2007 (Appeals from Licensing Authority Decisions) (Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys) Order 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE Modifications to the 2007 Act
Article 5 1 Section 96 of the 2007 Act (appeals against financial penalties) has effect in relation to a penalty imposed by the relevant body as if— (a) in subsection (1), “, before the end of such period as may be prescribed by rules made by the Board,” were omitted; (b) subsections (6) and (7) were omitted; and (c) for subsection (8) there were substituted— (8) Except as provided by this section or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, the validity of a penalty is not to be questioned by any legal proceedings whatever. . 2 (1) Schedule 13 (ownership of licensed bodies) has effect in relation to decisions of the relevant body with the following modifications. (2) Paragraph 18 (appeal from decision to approve notified interest subject to conditions) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (3) Paragraph 20 (appeal from decision to object to a notified interest) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (4) Paragraph 29 (appeal from decision to approve a notifiable interest subject to conditions) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (5) Paragraph 32 (appeal from decision to object to acquisition of a notifiable interest) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (6) Paragraph 34 (appeal from decision to impose conditions (or further conditions) on existing restricted interest) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (7) Paragraph 37 (appeal from decision to object to existing restricted interest) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (4) and (5) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (6), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (8) Paragraph 47 (notifying the Board of objection or condition as to a person’s holding of a restricted interest) has effect as if, in sub-paragraph (4), for “to the High Court” there were substituted “under Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (9) Paragraph 48 (notifying the Board of approval of the holding of a restricted interest by a person included in the Board’s list of persons subject to objections and conditions) has effect as if, in sub-paragraph (3), for “to the High Court” there were substituted “under Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (10) Paragraph 50 (appeal from decision to notify the Board where share limit or voting limit breached) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “any appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”.
SCHEDULE Modifications to the 2007 Act
Article 5 1 Section 96 of the 2007 Act (appeals against financial penalties) has effect in relation to a penalty imposed by the relevant body as if— (a) in subsection (1), “, before the end of such period as may be prescribed by rules made by the Board,” were omitted; (b) subsections (6) and (7) were omitted; and (c) for subsection (8) there were substituted— (8) Except as provided by this section or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, the validity of a penalty is not to be questioned by any legal proceedings whatever. . 2 (1) Schedule 13 (ownership of licensed bodies) has effect in relation to decisions of the relevant body with the following modifications. (2) Paragraph 18 (appeal from decision to approve notified interest subject to conditions) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (3) Paragraph 20 (appeal from decision to object to a notified interest) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (4) Paragraph 29 (appeal from decision to approve a notifiable interest subject to conditions) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (5) Paragraph 32 (appeal from decision to object to acquisition of a notifiable interest) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (6) Paragraph 34 (appeal from decision to impose conditions (or further conditions) on existing restricted interest) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (7) Paragraph 37 (appeal from decision to object to existing restricted interest) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (4) and (5) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (6), after “an appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (8) Paragraph 47 (notifying the Board of objection or condition as to a person’s holding of a restricted interest) has effect as if, in sub-paragraph (4), for “to the High Court” there were substituted “under Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (9) Paragraph 48 (notifying the Board of approval of the holding of a restricted interest by a person included in the Board’s list of persons subject to objections and conditions) has effect as if, in sub-paragraph (3), for “to the High Court” there were substituted “under Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. (10) Paragraph 50 (appeal from decision to notify the Board where share limit or voting limit breached) has effect as if— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), “before the end of the prescribed period” were omitted; (b) sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) were omitted; and (c) in sub-paragraph (5), after “any appeal under this paragraph” there were inserted “or Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.