British Technology Group Act 1991
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE 2 REPEALS
Section 17(2). Part I REPEALS ON APPOINTED DAY Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 1967 c. 32. | The Development of Inventions Act 1967. | Sections 2 to 13.Section 15(3) to (8).In the Schedule, paragraphs 4 to 8. 1972 c. 11. | The Superannuation Act 1972. | In Schedule 4 the entry relating to the National Research Development Corporation. 1975 c. 68. | The Industry Act 1975. | Part I except section 1. In section 13(2) the words the Board or in both places. In section 14(1) and (4) the words or the Board. In section 16(1)(b) and (4) the words or the Board. In section 19(3)(i) the words the Board or. In section 20(3) the words , the Board. Section 26. In section 37, in subsection (1) the definitions of accounting year and wholly owned subsidiary and subsections (2) and (4). In Schedule 1, paragraphs 7 to 10, 18, 19 and 20.Schedule 2. 1979 c. 32. | The Industry Act 1979. | In section 1, in subsection (1) the words “section 8 of the Industry Act 1975”, “the National Enterprise Board” and “that Board and”, in subsections (5) and (7) the figure “8” and in subsection (6) the figure “8(4)(b)” and the words “the Board or”.In the Schedule the entry relating to the Industry Act 1975. 1980 c. 33. | The Industry Act 1980. | Section 1(1). In section 2, in subsection (1) the words the National Enterprise Board and paragraph (a) and in subsections (2) and (3) the words the National Enterprise Board. Section 4(1). Section 5(3) and (5). Section 6(1). Section 8(1). In section 21(2) the words section 2(2) of the Industry Act 1975 and the National Enterprise Board. 1980 c. 65. | The Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980. | In section 170(2) the words “and the National Enterprise Board”. 1981 c. 6. | The Industry Act 1981. | Section 1. 1981 c. 68. | The Broadcasting Act 1981. | In section 65(2) the words “each of section 9 of the Industry Act 1975 and”.In Part II of Schedule 3 the entry relating to section 9 of the Industry Act 1975. 1983 c. 29. | The Miscellaneous Finan- cial Provisions Act 1983. | In Schedule 2 the entry relating to the Industry Act 1975. 1985 c. 9. | The Companies Consoli- dation (Consequential Provisions) Act 1985. | In Schedule 2 the entry relating to section 12(3) of the Development of Inventions Act 1967, in the entry relating to section 37(1) of the Industry Act 1975 the words from “and in the definition of “wholly-owned subsidiary”” onwards and the entries relating to Schedules 1 and 2 to that Act. 1986 c. 60. | The Financial Services Act 1986. | In Schedule 16, paragraph 10. 1988 c. 50. | The Housing Act 1988. | In Schedule 9, in paragraph 4(b) the words “the National Enterprise Board”. 1989 c. 43. | The Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1989. | In Schedule 2, paragraph 13. 1990 c. 42. | The Broadcasting Act 1990. | In Schedule 20, paragraph 22.In Schedule 22, paragraph 5(2)(a).
SCHEDULE 2 REPEALS
Section 17(2). Part I REPEALS ON APPOINTED DAY Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 1967 c. 32. | The Development of Inventions Act 1967. | Sections 2 to 13.Section 15(3) to (8).In the Schedule, paragraphs 4 to 8. 1972 c. 11. | The Superannuation Act 1972. | In Schedule 4 the entry relating to the National Research Development Corporation. 1975 c. 68. | The Industry Act 1975. | Part I except section 1. In section 13(2) the words the Board or in both places. In section 14(1) and (4) the words or the Board. In section 16(1)(b) and (4) the words or the Board. In section 19(3)(i) the words the Board or. In section 20(3) the words , the Board. Section 26. In section 37, in subsection (1) the definitions of accounting year and wholly owned subsidiary and subsections (2) and (4). In Schedule 1, paragraphs 7 to 10, 18, 19 and 20.Schedule 2. 1979 c. 32. | The Industry Act 1979. | In section 1, in subsection (1) the words “section 8 of the Industry Act 1975”, “the National Enterprise Board” and “that Board and”, in subsections (5) and (7) the figure “8” and in subsection (6) the figure “8(4)(b)” and the words “the Board or”.In the Schedule the entry relating to the Industry Act 1975. 1980 c. 33. | The Industry Act 1980. | Section 1(1). In section 2, in subsection (1) the words the National Enterprise Board and paragraph (a) and in subsections (2) and (3) the words the National Enterprise Board. Section 4(1). Section 5(3) and (5). Section 6(1). Section 8(1). In section 21(2) the words section 2(2) of the Industry Act 1975 and the National Enterprise Board. 1980 c. 65. | The Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980. | In section 170(2) the words “and the National Enterprise Board”. 1981 c. 6. | The Industry Act 1981. | Section 1. 1981 c. 68. | The Broadcasting Act 1981. | In section 65(2) the words “each of section 9 of the Industry Act 1975 and”.In Part II of Schedule 3 the entry relating to section 9 of the Industry Act 1975. 1983 c. 29. | The Miscellaneous Finan- cial Provisions Act 1983. | In Schedule 2 the entry relating to the Industry Act 1975. 1985 c. 9. | The Companies Consoli- dation (Consequential Provisions) Act 1985. | In Schedule 2 the entry relating to section 12(3) of the Development of Inventions Act 1967, in the entry relating to section 37(1) of the Industry Act 1975 the words from “and in the definition of “wholly-owned subsidiary”” onwards and the entries relating to Schedules 1 and 2 to that Act. 1986 c. 60. | The Financial Services Act 1986. | In Schedule 16, paragraph 10. 1988 c. 50. | The Housing Act 1988. | In Schedule 9, in paragraph 4(b) the words “the National Enterprise Board”. 1989 c. 43. | The Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1989. | In Schedule 2, paragraph 13. 1990 c. 42. | The Broadcasting Act 1990. | In Schedule 20, paragraph 22.In Schedule 22, paragraph 5(2)(a).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.