Scotland Act 1998
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
102 Powers of courts or tribunals to vary retrospective decisions.
(1) This section applies where any court or tribunal decides that— (a) an Act of the Scottish Parliament or any provision of such an Act is not within the legislative competence of the Parliament, or (b) a member of the Scottish Government does not have the power to make, confirm or approve a provision of subordinate legislation that he has purported to make, confirm or approve , or (c) any other purported exercise of a function by a member of the Scottish Government was outside devolved competence. (2) The court or tribunal may make an order— (a) removing or limiting any retrospective effect of the decision, or (b) suspending the effect of the decision for any period and on any conditions to allow the defect to be corrected. (3) In deciding whether to make an order under this section, the court or tribunal shall (among other things) have regard to the extent to which persons who are not parties to the proceedings would otherwise be adversely affected. (4) Where a court or tribunal is considering whether to make an order under this section, it shall order intimation of that fact to be given to— (a) the Lord Advocate, and (b) the appropriate law officer, where the decision mentioned in subsection (1) relates to a devolution issue (within the meaning of Schedule 6), or to a compatibility issue, unless the person to whom the intimation would be given is a party to the proceedings. (5) A person to whom intimation is given under subsection (4) may take part as a party in the proceedings so far as they relate to the making of the order. (5A) Where the decision mentioned in subsection (1) is a decision of the Supreme Court on a compatibility issue, the power to make an order under this section is exercisable by the High Court of Justiciary instead of the Supreme Court. (6) Paragraphs 36 and 37 of Schedule 6 apply with necessary modifications for the purposes of subsections (4) and (5) as they apply for the purposes of that Schedule. (7) In this section— “ compatibility issue ” has the meaning given by section 288ZA of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, “intimation” includes notice, “the appropriate law officer” means— in relation to proceedings in Scotland, the Advocate General, in relation to proceedings in England and Wales, the Attorney General, in relation to proceedings in Northern Ireland, the Advocate General for Northern Ireland.
102 Powers of courts or tribunals to vary retrospective decisions.
(1) This section applies where any court or tribunal decides that— (a) an Act of the Scottish Parliament or any provision of such an Act is not within the legislative competence of the Parliament, or (b) a member of the Scottish Government does not have the power to make, confirm or approve a provision of subordinate legislation that he has purported to make, confirm or approve , or (c) any other purported exercise of a function by a member of the Scottish Government was outside devolved competence. (2) The court or tribunal may make an order— (a) removing or limiting any retrospective effect of the decision, or (b) suspending the effect of the decision for any period and on any conditions to allow the defect to be corrected. (3) In deciding whether to make an order under this section, the court or tribunal shall (among other things) have regard to the extent to which persons who are not parties to the proceedings would otherwise be adversely affected. (4) Where a court or tribunal is considering whether to make an order under this section, it shall order intimation of that fact to be given to— (a) the Lord Advocate, and (b) the appropriate law officer, where the decision mentioned in subsection (1) relates to a devolution issue (within the meaning of Schedule 6), or to a compatibility issue, unless the person to whom the intimation would be given is a party to the proceedings. (5) A person to whom intimation is given under subsection (4) may take part as a party in the proceedings so far as they relate to the making of the order. (5A) Where the decision mentioned in subsection (1) is a decision of the Supreme Court on a compatibility issue, the power to make an order under this section is exercisable by the High Court of Justiciary instead of the Supreme Court. (6) Paragraphs 36 and 37 of Schedule 6 apply with necessary modifications for the purposes of subsections (4) and (5) as they apply for the purposes of that Schedule. (7) In this section— “ compatibility issue ” has the meaning given by section 288ZA of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, “intimation” includes notice, “the appropriate law officer” means— in relation to proceedings in Scotland, the Advocate General, in relation to proceedings in England and Wales, the Attorney General, in relation to proceedings in Northern Ireland, the Advocate General for Northern Ireland.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.