Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
29A Warning notice: quality of health care
(1) If it appears to the Commission that the quality of health care provided by an NHS trust established under section 25 of the National Health Service Act 2006 or by an NHS foundation trust requires significant improvement, the Commission may give the trust a warning notice.
(2) A warning notice under this section is a notice in writing—
(a) stating that the Commission has formed the view that the quality of health care provided by the trust requires significant improvement,
(b) specifying the health care concerned,
(c) giving the Commission's reasons for its view, and
(d) requiring the trust to make a significant improvement to the quality of the health care concerned within a specified time.
(3) Where a warning notice under this section imposes more than one requirement under subsection (2)(d), it may specify different times for different requirements.
(4) The Commission must—
(a) where the notice specifies only one time under subsection (2)(d), determine at the end of that time whether the requirement has been complied with;
(b) where the notice specifies more than one time under subsection (2)(d), determine at the end of the latest of those times, whether the requirements have been complied with.
(5) Where, having carried out the duty under subsection (4), the Commission is satisfied that a requirement to which the notice relates has not been complied with, it—
(a) must decide what action to take in relation to the trust, and
(b) must consider in particular whether to require NHS England to make an order under section 65B(1) or 65D(2) of the National Health Service Act 2006 (appointment of trust special administrator).
Your change, as a redline
29A Warning notice: quality of health care
(1) If it appears to the Commission that the quality of health care provided by an NHS trust established under section 25 of the National Health Service Act 2006 or by an NHS foundation trust requires significant improvement, the Commission may give the trust a warning notice.
(2) A warning notice under this section is a notice in writing—
(a) stating that the Commission has formed the view that the quality of health care provided by the trust requires significant improvement,
(b) specifying the health care concerned,
(c) giving the Commission's reasons for its view, and
(d) requiring the trust to make a significant improvement to the quality of the health care concerned within a specified time.
(3) Where a warning notice under this section imposes more than one requirement under subsection (2)(d), it may specify different times for different requirements.
(4) The Commission must—
(a) where the notice specifies only one time under subsection (2)(d), determine at the end of that time whether the requirement has been complied with;
(b) where the notice specifies more than one time under subsection (2)(d), determine at the end of the latest of those times, whether the requirements have been complied with.
(5) Where, having carried out the duty under subsection (4), the Commission is satisfied that a requirement to which the notice relates has not been complied with, it—
(a) must decide what action to take in relation to the trust, and
(b) must consider in particular whether to require NHS England to make an order under section 65B(1) or 65D(2) of the National Health Service Act 2006 (appointment of trust special administrator).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.