Propose a change

Water Industry Act 1991

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

33A Exceptions to duty to make reference

(1) The CMA may decide not to make a merger reference under section 32 as regards a case falling within section 32(a) if it believes that— (a) the arrangements concerned are not sufficiently far advanced, or are not sufficiently likely to proceed, to justify the making of a merger reference; (b) the prospective merger is not likely to prejudice the ability of the Authority, in carrying out its functions by virtue of this Act, to make comparisons between water enterprises; or (c) the prospective merger is likely to prejudice that ability, but the prejudice in question is outweighed by relevant customer benefits relating to the merger. (2) The CMA may decide not to make a merger reference under section 32 as regards a case falling within section 32(b) if it believes that— (a) the merger has not prejudiced and is not likely to prejudice the ability of the Authority, in carrying out its functions by virtue of this Act, to make comparisons between water enterprises; or (b) the merger has prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that ability, but the prejudice in question is outweighed by relevant customer benefits relating to the merger. (3) Before forming a view as to the matters in subsection (1)(b) or (c) or (2)(a) or (b), the CMA must— (a) request the Authority to give an opinion under section 33B, and (b) consider that opinion. (4) The CMA may not make a merger reference under section 32 if— (a) it is considering whether to accept an undertaking under section 33D instead of making such a reference; or (b) it is prevented by section 74 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (effect of accepting an undertaking in lieu), in a case where that section as applied by paragraph 1 of Schedule 4ZA may have effect to prevent such a merger reference. (5) In this section “relevant customer benefit” has the meaning given by paragraph 7 of Schedule 4ZA.

Your change, as a redline

33A Exceptions to duty to make reference

(1) The CMA may decide not to make a merger reference under section 32 as regards a case falling within section 32(a) if it believes that— (a) the arrangements concerned are not sufficiently far advanced, or are not sufficiently likely to proceed, to justify the making of a merger reference; (b) the prospective merger is not likely to prejudice the ability of the Authority, in carrying out its functions by virtue of this Act, to make comparisons between water enterprises; or (c) the prospective merger is likely to prejudice that ability, but the prejudice in question is outweighed by relevant customer benefits relating to the merger. (2) The CMA may decide not to make a merger reference under section 32 as regards a case falling within section 32(b) if it believes that— (a) the merger has not prejudiced and is not likely to prejudice the ability of the Authority, in carrying out its functions by virtue of this Act, to make comparisons between water enterprises; or (b) the merger has prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that ability, but the prejudice in question is outweighed by relevant customer benefits relating to the merger. (3) Before forming a view as to the matters in subsection (1)(b) or (c) or (2)(a) or (b), the CMA must— (a) request the Authority to give an opinion under section 33B, and (b) consider that opinion. (4) The CMA may not make a merger reference under section 32 if— (a) it is considering whether to accept an undertaking under section 33D instead of making such a reference; or (b) it is prevented by section 74 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (effect of accepting an undertaking in lieu), in a case where that section as applied by paragraph 1 of Schedule 4ZA may have effect to prevent such a merger reference. (5) In this section “relevant customer benefit” has the meaning given by paragraph 7 of Schedule 4ZA.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds