Propose a change

Pensions Act 2004

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

179 Valuations to determine scheme underfunding

(1) For the purposes of enabling risk-based pension protection levies (within the meaning of section 175) to be calculated in respect of eligible schemes, regulations may make provision requiring the trustees or managers of each such scheme to provide the Board or the Regulator on the Board’s behalf— (a) with an actuarial valuation of the scheme at such intervals as may be prescribed, and (b) with such other information as the Board may require in respect of the assets and protected liabilities of the scheme at such times as may be prescribed. (2) For the purposes of this section, in relation to a scheme— “an actuarial valuation” means a written valuation of the scheme’s assets and protected liabilities prepared and signed by the actuary; “the actuary” means— the actuary appointed under section 47(1)(b) of the Pensions Act 1995 (c. 26) (professional advisers) in relation to the scheme, or if no such actuary has been appointed— a person with prescribed qualifications or experience, or a person approved by the Secretary of State. (3) Regulations under this section may prescribe how— (a) the assets and the protected liabilities of schemes, and (b) their amount or value, are to be determined, calculated and verified. (4) Subject to any provision made under subsection (3), those matters are to be determined, calculated and verified in accordance with guidance issued by the Board. (5) In calculating the amount of any liabilities for the purposes of a valuation required by virtue of this section, a provision of the scheme rules which limits the amount of the scheme’s liabilities by reference to the value of its assets is to be disregarded. (6) In this section references to “assets” do not include assets representing the value of any rights in respect of money purchase benefits under the scheme rules.

Your change, as a redline

179 Valuations to determine scheme underfunding

(1) For the purposes of enabling risk-based pension protection levies (within the meaning of section 175) to be calculated in respect of eligible schemes, regulations may make provision requiring the trustees or managers of each such scheme to provide the Board or the Regulator on the Board’s behalf— (a) with an actuarial valuation of the scheme at such intervals as may be prescribed, and (b) with such other information as the Board may require in respect of the assets and protected liabilities of the scheme at such times as may be prescribed. (2) For the purposes of this section, in relation to a scheme— “an actuarial valuation” means a written valuation of the scheme’s assets and protected liabilities prepared and signed by the actuary; “the actuary” means— the actuary appointed under section 47(1)(b) of the Pensions Act 1995 (c. 26) (professional advisers) in relation to the scheme, or if no such actuary has been appointed— a person with prescribed qualifications or experience, or a person approved by the Secretary of State. (3) Regulations under this section may prescribe how— (a) the assets and the protected liabilities of schemes, and (b) their amount or value, are to be determined, calculated and verified. (4) Subject to any provision made under subsection (3), those matters are to be determined, calculated and verified in accordance with guidance issued by the Board. (5) In calculating the amount of any liabilities for the purposes of a valuation required by virtue of this section, a provision of the scheme rules which limits the amount of the scheme’s liabilities by reference to the value of its assets is to be disregarded. (6) In this section references to “assets” do not include assets representing the value of any rights in respect of money purchase benefits under the scheme rules.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds