Propose a change

Pensions Act 2004

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

218 Obstruction etc of the PPF Ombudsman

(1) This section applies if any person— (a) without lawful excuse obstructs the PPF Ombudsman in the performance of his functions, or (b) is guilty of any act or omission in relation to an investigation by the PPF Ombudsman under regulations made under section 213 or 214, which, if that investigation were a proceeding in the court, would constitute contempt of court. (2) The PPF Ombudsman may certify the offence to the court. (3) Where an offence is certified under subsection (2), the court may— (a) inquire into the matter, (b) hear any witnesses who may be produced against or on behalf of the person charged with the offence and any statement that may be offered in defence, and (c) deal with him in any manner in which the court could deal with him if he had committed the like offence in relation to the court. (4) This section is to be construed, in its application to Scotland, as if contempt of court were categorised as an offence in Scots law. (5) In this section “the court” means— (a) in England and Wales, the county court; (b) in Scotland, the sheriff.

Your change, as a redline

218 Obstruction etc of the PPF Ombudsman

(1) This section applies if any person— (a) without lawful excuse obstructs the PPF Ombudsman in the performance of his functions, or (b) is guilty of any act or omission in relation to an investigation by the PPF Ombudsman under regulations made under section 213 or 214, which, if that investigation were a proceeding in the court, would constitute contempt of court. (2) The PPF Ombudsman may certify the offence to the court. (3) Where an offence is certified under subsection (2), the court may— (a) inquire into the matter, (b) hear any witnesses who may be produced against or on behalf of the person charged with the offence and any statement that may be offered in defence, and (c) deal with him in any manner in which the court could deal with him if he had committed the like offence in relation to the court. (4) This section is to be construed, in its application to Scotland, as if contempt of court were categorised as an offence in Scots law. (5) In this section “the court” means— (a) in England and Wales, the county court; (b) in Scotland, the sheriff.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds