Propose a change

Pensions Act 2004

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

33 Prohibition orders

For section 3 of the Pensions Act 1995 (c. 26) (prohibition orders) substitute— Prohibition orders 3 (1) The Authority may by order prohibit a person from being a trustee of— (a) a particular trust scheme, (b) a particular description of trust schemes, or (c) trust schemes in general, if they are satisfied that he is not a fit and proper person to be a trustee of the scheme or schemes to which the order relates. (2) Where a prohibition order is made under subsection (1) against a person in respect of one or more schemes of which he is a trustee, the order has the effect of removing him. (3) The Authority may, on the application of any person prohibited under this section, by order revoke the order either generally or in relation to a particular scheme or description of schemes. (4) An application under subsection (3) may not be made— (a) during the period within which the determination to exercise the power to make the prohibition order may be referred to the Tribunal under section 96(3) or 99(7) of the Pensions Act 2004, and (b) if the determination is so referred, until the reference, and any appeal against the Tribunal’s determination, has been finally disposed of. (5) A revocation made at any time under this section cannot affect anything done before that time. (6) The Authority must prepare and publish a statement of the policies they intend to adopt in relation to the exercise of their powers under this section. (7) The Authority may revise any statement published under subsection (6) and must publish any revised statement. (8) In this section “the Tribunal” means the Pensions Regulator Tribunal established under section 102 of the Pensions Act 2004.

Your change, as a redline

33 Prohibition orders

For section 3 of the Pensions Act 1995 (c. 26) (prohibition orders) substitute— Prohibition orders 3 (1) The Authority may by order prohibit a person from being a trustee of— (a) a particular trust scheme, (b) a particular description of trust schemes, or (c) trust schemes in general, if they are satisfied that he is not a fit and proper person to be a trustee of the scheme or schemes to which the order relates. (2) Where a prohibition order is made under subsection (1) against a person in respect of one or more schemes of which he is a trustee, the order has the effect of removing him. (3) The Authority may, on the application of any person prohibited under this section, by order revoke the order either generally or in relation to a particular scheme or description of schemes. (4) An application under subsection (3) may not be made— (a) during the period within which the determination to exercise the power to make the prohibition order may be referred to the Tribunal under section 96(3) or 99(7) of the Pensions Act 2004, and (b) if the determination is so referred, until the reference, and any appeal against the Tribunal’s determination, has been finally disposed of. (5) A revocation made at any time under this section cannot affect anything done before that time. (6) The Authority must prepare and publish a statement of the policies they intend to adopt in relation to the exercise of their powers under this section. (7) The Authority may revise any statement published under subsection (6) and must publish any revised statement. (8) In this section “the Tribunal” means the Pensions Regulator Tribunal established under section 102 of the Pensions Act 2004.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds