Propose a change

Pensions Act 2004

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

77 Penalties relating to sections 72 to 75

(1) A person who, without reasonable excuse, neglects or refuses to provide information or produce a document when required to do so under section 72 is guilty of an offence. (1A) A person who, without reasonable excuse, neglects or refuses— (a) to attend before the Regulator as required under section 72A(1), or (b) to answer a question or provide an explanation on a matter specified in the notice under section 72A(1), when so attending before the Regulator, is guilty of an offence. (2) A person who without reasonable excuse— (a) intentionally delays or obstructs an inspector exercising any power under section 73, 74 or 75, (b) neglects or refuses to produce, or secure the production of, any document when required to do so under section 75, or (c) neglects or refuses to answer a question or to provide information when so required, is guilty of an offence. (3) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) , (1A) or (2) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale. (4) An offence under subsection (1) , (1A) or (2)(b) or (c) may be charged by reference to any day or longer period of time; and a person may be convicted of a second or subsequent offence by reference to any period of time following the preceding conviction of the offence. (5) Any person who intentionally and without reasonable excuse alters, suppresses, conceals or destroys any document which he is or is liable to be required to produce under section 72 or 75 is guilty of an offence. (6) Any person guilty of an offence under subsection (5) is liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or both.

Your change, as a redline

77 Penalties relating to sections 72 to 75

(1) A person who, without reasonable excuse, neglects or refuses to provide information or produce a document when required to do so under section 72 is guilty of an offence. (1A) A person who, without reasonable excuse, neglects or refuses— (a) to attend before the Regulator as required under section 72A(1), or (b) to answer a question or provide an explanation on a matter specified in the notice under section 72A(1), when so attending before the Regulator, is guilty of an offence. (2) A person who without reasonable excuse— (a) intentionally delays or obstructs an inspector exercising any power under section 73, 74 or 75, (b) neglects or refuses to produce, or secure the production of, any document when required to do so under section 75, or (c) neglects or refuses to answer a question or to provide information when so required, is guilty of an offence. (3) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) , (1A) or (2) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale. (4) An offence under subsection (1) , (1A) or (2)(b) or (c) may be charged by reference to any day or longer period of time; and a person may be convicted of a second or subsequent offence by reference to any period of time following the preceding conviction of the offence. (5) Any person who intentionally and without reasonable excuse alters, suppresses, conceals or destroys any document which he is or is liable to be required to produce under section 72 or 75 is guilty of an offence. (6) Any person guilty of an offence under subsection (5) is liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or both.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds