National Health Service (Amendment) Act 1995
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
7 Disqualified practitioners: engagement in provision of services by others.
In section 29(3) of the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978 (functions of Tribunal on finding that the inclusion of a person’s name in a list under Part II of that Act would be prejudicial to the efficiency of the services to which the list relates)— (a) the words “shall direct that his name be removed from that list” shall be paragraph (a); (b) the words “may also, if they think fit, direct that his name be removed from, or not be included in, any corresponding list kept by any other Health Board under this Part” shall be paragraph (b); and (c) there shall be added at the end— , and (c) where they make a direction under paragraph (b) above, may also, if they think fit, declare that he is not fit to be engaged in any capacity in the provision of those services.
7 Disqualified practitioners: engagement in provision of services by others.
In section 29(3) of the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978 (functions of Tribunal on finding that the inclusion of a person’s name in a list under Part II of that Act would be prejudicial to the efficiency of the services to which the list relates)— (a) the words “shall direct that his name be removed from that list” shall be paragraph (a); (b) the words “may also, if they think fit, direct that his name be removed from, or not be included in, any corresponding list kept by any other Health Board under this Part” shall be paragraph (b); and (c) there shall be added at the end— , and (c) where they make a direction under paragraph (b) above, may also, if they think fit, declare that he is not fit to be engaged in any capacity in the provision of those services.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.