The Tillbridge Solar Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
40 Trees subject to tree preservation orders
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the undertaker must not under the powers of this article fell, lop, prune, or cut back the roots of any tree which is the subject of a tree preservation order. (2) The undertaker may fell or lop any tree that is subject to a tree preservation order which was made after 10 April 2024 within or overhanging land within the Order limits or cut back its roots, if it reasonably believes it to be necessary to do so in order to prevent the tree from obstructing or interfering with the construction, maintenance or operation of the authorised development or any apparatus used in connection with the authorised development. (3) In carrying out any activity authorised by paragraph (1)— (a) the undertaker must do no unnecessary damage to any tree and must pay compensation to any person for any loss or damage arising from such activity; and (b) the duty contained in section 206(1) (replacement of trees) of the 1990 Act does not apply. (4) The authority given by paragraph (1) constitutes a deemed consent under the relevant tree preservation order. (5) Any dispute as to a person’s entitlement to compensation under paragraph (3), or as to the amount of compensation, is to be determined under Part 1 (determination of questions of disputed compensation) of the 1961 Act.
40 Trees subject to tree preservation orders
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the undertaker must not under the powers of this article fell, lop, prune, or cut back the roots of any tree which is the subject of a tree preservation order. (2) The undertaker may fell or lop any tree that is subject to a tree preservation order which was made after 10 April 2024 within or overhanging land within the Order limits or cut back its roots, if it reasonably believes it to be necessary to do so in order to prevent the tree from obstructing or interfering with the construction, maintenance or operation of the authorised development or any apparatus used in connection with the authorised development. (3) In carrying out any activity authorised by paragraph (1)— (a) the undertaker must do no unnecessary damage to any tree and must pay compensation to any person for any loss or damage arising from such activity; and (b) the duty contained in section 206(1) (replacement of trees) of the 1990 Act does not apply. (4) The authority given by paragraph (1) constitutes a deemed consent under the relevant tree preservation order. (5) Any dispute as to a person’s entitlement to compensation under paragraph (3), or as to the amount of compensation, is to be determined under Part 1 (determination of questions of disputed compensation) of the 1961 Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.