Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

102 Accused’s response to statement of information

(1) When the prosecutor gives the court a statement of information and the court is satisfied that he has served a copy on the accused, the court shall order the accused— (a) to indicate the extent to which he accepts each allegation in the statement, and (b) so far as he does not accept such an allegation, to give particulars of any matters he proposes to rely on, within the period it orders. (2) Where by virtue of section 99 the court postpones proceedings under section 92, the period ordered by the court under subsection (1) shall be a period ending not less than six months before the end of the permitted period mentioned in section 99. (3) If the accused accepts to any extent an allegation in a statement of information the court may treat his acceptance as conclusive of the matters to which it relates for the purpose of deciding the issues referred to in section 101(2) or (4) (as the case may be). (4) If the accused fails in any respect to comply with an order under subsection (1) he may be treated for the purposes of subsection (3) as accepting every allegation in the statement of information apart from— (a) any allegation in respect of which he has complied with the requirement; (b) any allegation that he has benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct. (5) Where— (a) an allegation in a statement of information is challenged by the accused, or (b) the matters referred to in subsection (1)(b) are challenged by the prosecutor, the court must consider the matters being challenged at a hearing. (6) The judge presiding at the hearing may, if he is not the trial judge and he considers it in the interests of justice to do so, adjourn the hearing to a date when the trial judge is available. (7) If the court makes an order under this section it may at any time vary it by making another one. (8) No acceptance under this section that the accused has benefited from conduct is admissible in evidence in proceedings for an offence.

Your change, as a redline

102 Accused’s response to statement of information

(1) When the prosecutor gives the court a statement of information and the court is satisfied that he has served a copy on the accused, the court shall order the accused— (a) to indicate the extent to which he accepts each allegation in the statement, and (b) so far as he does not accept such an allegation, to give particulars of any matters he proposes to rely on, within the period it orders. (2) Where by virtue of section 99 the court postpones proceedings under section 92, the period ordered by the court under subsection (1) shall be a period ending not less than six months before the end of the permitted period mentioned in section 99. (3) If the accused accepts to any extent an allegation in a statement of information the court may treat his acceptance as conclusive of the matters to which it relates for the purpose of deciding the issues referred to in section 101(2) or (4) (as the case may be). (4) If the accused fails in any respect to comply with an order under subsection (1) he may be treated for the purposes of subsection (3) as accepting every allegation in the statement of information apart from— (a) any allegation in respect of which he has complied with the requirement; (b) any allegation that he has benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct. (5) Where— (a) an allegation in a statement of information is challenged by the accused, or (b) the matters referred to in subsection (1)(b) are challenged by the prosecutor, the court must consider the matters being challenged at a hearing. (6) The judge presiding at the hearing may, if he is not the trial judge and he considers it in the interests of justice to do so, adjourn the hearing to a date when the trial judge is available. (7) If the court makes an order under this section it may at any time vary it by making another one. (8) No acceptance under this section that the accused has benefited from conduct is admissible in evidence in proceedings for an offence.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds