Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

119 Conditions for exercise of powers

(1) The court may exercise the powers conferred by section 120 if any of the following conditions is satisfied. (2) The first condition is that— (a) a criminal investigation has been instituted in Scotland with regard to an offence, and (b) there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the alleged offender has benefited from his criminal conduct. (3) The second condition is that— (a) proceedings for an offence have been instituted in Scotland and not concluded, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the accused has benefited from his criminal conduct. (4) The third condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 104, 105, 111 or 112 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the accused has benefited from his criminal conduct. (5) The fourth condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 106 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the accused’s benefit exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section). (6) The fifth condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 107 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the available amount exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section). (7) The second condition is not satisfied if the court believes that— (a) there has been undue delay in continuing the proceedings, or (b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed. (8) If an application mentioned in the third, fourth or fifth condition has been made the condition is not satisfied if the court believes that— (a) there has been undue delay in continuing the application, or (b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed. (9) If the first condition is satisfied— (a) references in this Part to the accused are to the alleged offender; (b) references in this Part to the prosecutor are to the person the court believes is to have conduct of any proceedings for the offence; (c) section 144(8) has effect as if proceedings for the offence had been instituted against the accused when the investigation was instituted. (10) In this section, sections 120 to 140 and Schedule 3 “the court” means— (a) the Court of Session, where a trial diet or a diet fixed for the purposes of section 76 of the Procedure Act in proceedings for the offence or offences concerned is to be, is being or has been held in the High Court of Justiciary; (b) the sheriff exercising his civil jurisdiction, where a diet referred to in paragraph (a) is to be, is being or has been held in the sheriff court.

Your change, as a redline

119 Conditions for exercise of powers

(1) The court may exercise the powers conferred by section 120 if any of the following conditions is satisfied. (2) The first condition is that— (a) a criminal investigation has been instituted in Scotland with regard to an offence, and (b) there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the alleged offender has benefited from his criminal conduct. (3) The second condition is that— (a) proceedings for an offence have been instituted in Scotland and not concluded, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the accused has benefited from his criminal conduct. (4) The third condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 104, 105, 111 or 112 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the accused has benefited from his criminal conduct. (5) The fourth condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 106 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the accused’s benefit exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section). (6) The fifth condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 107 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the available amount exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section). (7) The second condition is not satisfied if the court believes that— (a) there has been undue delay in continuing the proceedings, or (b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed. (8) If an application mentioned in the third, fourth or fifth condition has been made the condition is not satisfied if the court believes that— (a) there has been undue delay in continuing the application, or (b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed. (9) If the first condition is satisfied— (a) references in this Part to the accused are to the alleged offender; (b) references in this Part to the prosecutor are to the person the court believes is to have conduct of any proceedings for the offence; (c) section 144(8) has effect as if proceedings for the offence had been instituted against the accused when the investigation was instituted. (10) In this section, sections 120 to 140 and Schedule 3 “the court” means— (a) the Court of Session, where a trial diet or a diet fixed for the purposes of section 76 of the Procedure Act in proceedings for the offence or offences concerned is to be, is being or has been held in the High Court of Justiciary; (b) the sheriff exercising his civil jurisdiction, where a diet referred to in paragraph (a) is to be, is being or has been held in the sheriff court.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds