Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

123 Inhibition of property affected by order

(1) On the application of the prosecutor, the court may, in relation to the property mentioned in subsection (2), grant warrant for inhibition against any person specified in a restraint order. (2) That property is the heritable realisable property to which the restraint order applies (whether generally or such of it as is specified in the application). (3) The warrant for inhibition— (a) has effect as if granted on the dependence of an action for debt by the prosecutor against the person and may be executed, recalled, loosed or restricted accordingly, and (b) must forthwith be registered by the prosecutor in the Register of Inhibitions (4) Section 155 of the Titles to Land Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1868 (c. 101) (effective date of inhibition) applies in relation to an inhibition for which warrant is granted under subsection (1) .... (5) The execution of an inhibition under this section in respect of property does not prejudice the exercise of an administrator’s powers under or for the purposes of this Part in respect of that property. (6) An inhibition executed under this section ceases to have effect when, or in so far as, the restraint order ceases to apply in respect of the property in relation to which the warrant for inhibition was granted. (7) If an inhibition ceases to have effect to any extent by virtue of subsection (6) the prosecutor must— (a) apply for the recall or, as the case may be, the restriction of the inhibition, and (b) ensure that the recall or restriction is reflected in the Register of Inhibitions and Adjudications.

Your change, as a redline

123 Inhibition of property affected by order

(1) On the application of the prosecutor, the court may, in relation to the property mentioned in subsection (2), grant warrant for inhibition against any person specified in a restraint order. (2) That property is the heritable realisable property to which the restraint order applies (whether generally or such of it as is specified in the application). (3) The warrant for inhibition— (a) has effect as if granted on the dependence of an action for debt by the prosecutor against the person and may be executed, recalled, loosed or restricted accordingly, and (b) must forthwith be registered by the prosecutor in the Register of Inhibitions (4) Section 155 of the Titles to Land Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1868 (c. 101) (effective date of inhibition) applies in relation to an inhibition for which warrant is granted under subsection (1) .... (5) The execution of an inhibition under this section in respect of property does not prejudice the exercise of an administrator’s powers under or for the purposes of this Part in respect of that property. (6) An inhibition executed under this section ceases to have effect when, or in so far as, the restraint order ceases to apply in respect of the property in relation to which the warrant for inhibition was granted. (7) If an inhibition ceases to have effect to any extent by virtue of subsection (6) the prosecutor must— (a) apply for the recall or, as the case may be, the restriction of the inhibition, and (b) ensure that the recall or restriction is reflected in the Register of Inhibitions and Adjudications.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds