Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

139 Serious default

(1) If the following three conditions are satisfied the court may order the payment of such compensation as it thinks is just. (2) The first condition is satisfied if a criminal investigation has been instituted with regard to an offence and proceedings are not instituted for the offence. (3) The first condition is also satisfied if proceedings for an offence are instituted against a person and— (a) they do not result in his conviction for the offence, or (b) he is convicted of the offence but the conviction is quashed or he is pardoned in respect of it. (4) If subsection (2) applies the second condition is that— (a) in the criminal investigation there has been a serious default by a person mentioned in subsection (9), and (b) the investigation would not have continued if the default had not occurred. (5) If subsection (3) applies the second condition is that— (a) in the criminal investigation with regard to the offence or in its prosecution there has been a serious default by a person mentioned in subsection (9), and (b) the proceedings would not have been instituted or continued if the default had not occurred. (6) The third condition is that an application is made under this section by a person who held realisable property and has suffered loss in consequence of anything done in relation to it by or in pursuance of an order under this Part. (7) The offence referred to in subsection (2) may be one of a number of offences with regard to which the investigation is instituted. (8) The offence referred to in subsection (3) may be one of a number of offences for which the proceedings are instituted. (9) Compensation under this section is payable to the applicant and— (a) if the person in default was a constable of a police force (within the meaning of the Police (Scotland) Act 1967 (c. 77)), the compensation is payable by the Scottish Police Authority; (aa) if the person in default was a constable of the Police Service of Scotland, the compensation is payable by the Scottish Police Authority, (b) if the person in default was a constable not falling within paragraph (a), the compensation is payable by the body under whose authority he acts; (c) if the person in default was a procurator fiscal or was acting on behalf of the Lord Advocate, the compensation is payable by the Lord Advocate; (ca) if the person in default was a National Crime Agency officer, the compensation is payable by the National Crime Agency; (d) if the person in default was a customs officer, the compensation is payable by the Commissioners of Customs and Excise; (e) if the person in default was an officer of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue, the compensation is payable by those Commissioners. (10) Nothing in this section affects any delictual liability in relation to a serious default.

Your change, as a redline

139 Serious default

(1) If the following three conditions are satisfied the court may order the payment of such compensation as it thinks is just. (2) The first condition is satisfied if a criminal investigation has been instituted with regard to an offence and proceedings are not instituted for the offence. (3) The first condition is also satisfied if proceedings for an offence are instituted against a person and— (a) they do not result in his conviction for the offence, or (b) he is convicted of the offence but the conviction is quashed or he is pardoned in respect of it. (4) If subsection (2) applies the second condition is that— (a) in the criminal investigation there has been a serious default by a person mentioned in subsection (9), and (b) the investigation would not have continued if the default had not occurred. (5) If subsection (3) applies the second condition is that— (a) in the criminal investigation with regard to the offence or in its prosecution there has been a serious default by a person mentioned in subsection (9), and (b) the proceedings would not have been instituted or continued if the default had not occurred. (6) The third condition is that an application is made under this section by a person who held realisable property and has suffered loss in consequence of anything done in relation to it by or in pursuance of an order under this Part. (7) The offence referred to in subsection (2) may be one of a number of offences with regard to which the investigation is instituted. (8) The offence referred to in subsection (3) may be one of a number of offences for which the proceedings are instituted. (9) Compensation under this section is payable to the applicant and— (a) if the person in default was a constable of a police force (within the meaning of the Police (Scotland) Act 1967 (c. 77)), the compensation is payable by the Scottish Police Authority; (aa) if the person in default was a constable of the Police Service of Scotland, the compensation is payable by the Scottish Police Authority, (b) if the person in default was a constable not falling within paragraph (a), the compensation is payable by the body under whose authority he acts; (c) if the person in default was a procurator fiscal or was acting on behalf of the Lord Advocate, the compensation is payable by the Lord Advocate; (ca) if the person in default was a National Crime Agency officer, the compensation is payable by the National Crime Agency; (d) if the person in default was a customs officer, the compensation is payable by the Commissioners of Customs and Excise; (e) if the person in default was an officer of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue, the compensation is payable by those Commissioners. (10) Nothing in this section affects any delictual liability in relation to a serious default.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds