Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

195B Conditions for exercise of powers

(1) An appropriate officer may exercise the power conferred by section 195C if satisfied that any of the following conditions is met. (2) The first condition is that— (a) a criminal investigation has been started in Northern Ireland with regard to an indictable offence, (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) proceedings for the offence have not yet been started against the person in Northern Ireland, (d) there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the person has benefited from conduct constituting the offence, and (e) a restraint order is not in force in respect of any realisable property. (3) The second condition is that— (a) a criminal investigation has been started in Northern Ireland with regard to an indictable offence, (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) proceedings for the offence have not yet been started against the person in Northern Ireland, and (d) a restraint order is in force in respect of any realisable property. (4) The third condition is that— (a) proceedings for an indictable offence have been started in Northern Ireland and have not been concluded, (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant has benefited from conduct constituting the offence, and (c) a restraint order is not in force in respect of any realisable property. (5) The fourth condition is that— (a) proceedings for an indictable offence have been started in Northern Ireland and have not been concluded, and (b) a restraint order is in force in respect of any realisable property. (6) The fifth condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 169, 170, 177 or 178 and not concluded, or the officer believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant has benefited from criminal conduct. (7) The sixth condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 171 and not concluded, or the officer believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the defendant's benefit exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section). (8) The seventh condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 172 and not concluded, or the officer believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the available amount exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section). (9) The third or fourth condition is not met if the officer believes that— (a) there has been undue delay in continuing the proceedings, or (b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed. (10) If an application mentioned in the fifth, sixth or seventh condition has been made the condition is not met if the officer believes that— (a) there has been undue delay in continuing the application, or (b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed. (11) In relation to the first or second condition references in sections 195C to 195S to the defendant are to the person mentioned in that condition. (12) In relation to the first or second condition section 225(9) has effect as if proceedings for the offence had been started against the defendant when the investigation was started.

Your change, as a redline

195B Conditions for exercise of powers

(1) An appropriate officer may exercise the power conferred by section 195C if satisfied that any of the following conditions is met. (2) The first condition is that— (a) a criminal investigation has been started in Northern Ireland with regard to an indictable offence, (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) proceedings for the offence have not yet been started against the person in Northern Ireland, (d) there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the person has benefited from conduct constituting the offence, and (e) a restraint order is not in force in respect of any realisable property. (3) The second condition is that— (a) a criminal investigation has been started in Northern Ireland with regard to an indictable offence, (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) proceedings for the offence have not yet been started against the person in Northern Ireland, and (d) a restraint order is in force in respect of any realisable property. (4) The third condition is that— (a) proceedings for an indictable offence have been started in Northern Ireland and have not been concluded, (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant has benefited from conduct constituting the offence, and (c) a restraint order is not in force in respect of any realisable property. (5) The fourth condition is that— (a) proceedings for an indictable offence have been started in Northern Ireland and have not been concluded, and (b) a restraint order is in force in respect of any realisable property. (6) The fifth condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 169, 170, 177 or 178 and not concluded, or the officer believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant has benefited from criminal conduct. (7) The sixth condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 171 and not concluded, or the officer believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the defendant's benefit exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section). (8) The seventh condition is that— (a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 172 and not concluded, or the officer believes that such an application is to be made, and (b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the available amount exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section). (9) The third or fourth condition is not met if the officer believes that— (a) there has been undue delay in continuing the proceedings, or (b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed. (10) If an application mentioned in the fifth, sixth or seventh condition has been made the condition is not met if the officer believes that— (a) there has been undue delay in continuing the application, or (b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed. (11) In relation to the first or second condition references in sections 195C to 195S to the defendant are to the person mentioned in that condition. (12) In relation to the first or second condition section 225(9) has effect as if proceedings for the offence had been started against the defendant when the investigation was started.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds