Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

2A Contribution to the reduction of crime

(1) A relevant authority must exercise its functions under this Act in the way which it considers is best calculated to contribute to the reduction of crime. (2) In this section “a relevant authority” means— (a) the National Crime Agency, (b) the Director of Public Prosecutions, (c) the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland, (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... (e) the Director of the Serious Fraud Office. (f) Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, or (g) the Financial Conduct Authority. (3) In considering under subsection (1) the way which is best calculated to contribute to the reduction of crime a relevant authority must have regard to any guidance given to it by— (a) in the case of the National Crime Agency, the Secretary of State, (b) in the case of the Director of Public Prosecutions ... or the Director of the Serious Fraud Office, the Attorney General, ... (c) in the case of the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland, the Advocate General for Northern Ireland , and (d) in the case of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs or the Financial Conduct Authority, the Treasury. (4) The guidance must indicate that the reduction of crime is in general best secured by means of criminal investigations and criminal proceedings. (5) The reference in this section to the Advocate General for Northern Ireland is to be read, before the coming into force of section 27(1) of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 (c. 26), as a reference to the Attorney General for Northern Ireland.

Your change, as a redline

2A Contribution to the reduction of crime

(1) A relevant authority must exercise its functions under this Act in the way which it considers is best calculated to contribute to the reduction of crime. (2) In this section “a relevant authority” means— (a) the National Crime Agency, (b) the Director of Public Prosecutions, (c) the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland, (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... (e) the Director of the Serious Fraud Office. (f) Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, or (g) the Financial Conduct Authority. (3) In considering under subsection (1) the way which is best calculated to contribute to the reduction of crime a relevant authority must have regard to any guidance given to it by— (a) in the case of the National Crime Agency, the Secretary of State, (b) in the case of the Director of Public Prosecutions ... or the Director of the Serious Fraud Office, the Attorney General, ... (c) in the case of the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland, the Advocate General for Northern Ireland , and (d) in the case of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs or the Financial Conduct Authority, the Treasury. (4) The guidance must indicate that the reduction of crime is in general best secured by means of criminal investigations and criminal proceedings. (5) The reference in this section to the Advocate General for Northern Ireland is to be read, before the coming into force of section 27(1) of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 (c. 26), as a reference to the Attorney General for Northern Ireland.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds