Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

3 Accreditation and training

(1) The National Crime Agency must provide a system for the accreditation of financial investigators. (2) The system of accreditation must include provision for— (a) the monitoring of the performance of accredited financial investigators, and (b) the withdrawal of accreditation from any person who contravenes or fails to comply with any condition subject to which he was accredited , and (c) securing that decisions under that system which concern— (i) the grant or withdrawal of accreditations, or (ii) the monitoring of the performance of accredited financial investigators, are taken without regard to their effect on operations by the National Crime Agency or any other person. (3) A person may be accredited— (a) in relation to this Act; (b) in relation to particular provisions of this Act. (4) But the accreditation may be limited to specified purposes. (5) A reference in this Act to an accredited financial investigator is to be construed accordingly. (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) The National Crime Agency must make provision for the training of persons in— (a) financial investigation, and (b) the operation of this Act. (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your change, as a redline

3 Accreditation and training

(1) The National Crime Agency must provide a system for the accreditation of financial investigators. (2) The system of accreditation must include provision for— (a) the monitoring of the performance of accredited financial investigators, and (b) the withdrawal of accreditation from any person who contravenes or fails to comply with any condition subject to which he was accredited , and (c) securing that decisions under that system which concern— (i) the grant or withdrawal of accreditations, or (ii) the monitoring of the performance of accredited financial investigators, are taken without regard to their effect on operations by the National Crime Agency or any other person. (3) A person may be accredited— (a) in relation to this Act; (b) in relation to particular provisions of this Act. (4) But the accreditation may be limited to specified purposes. (5) A reference in this Act to an accredited financial investigator is to be construed accordingly. (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) The National Crime Agency must make provision for the training of persons in— (a) financial investigation, and (b) the operation of this Act. (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds