Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

303Z63 Victims and other owners

(1) This section applies where converted cryptoassets are detained under this Chapter. (2) Where this section applies, a person (“P”) who claims that the relevant cryptoassets belonged to P immediately before— (a) the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or (b) the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet in which the relevant cryptoassets were held, may apply to the relevant court for some or all of the converted cryptoassets to be released to P. (3) The application may be made in the course of proceedings under section 303Z57, 303Z58 or 303Z60 or at any other time. (4) The relevant court may order the converted cryptoassets to which the application relates to be released to the applicant if it appears to the relevant court that the condition in subsection (5) is met. (5) The condition in this subsection is that— (a) the applicant was deprived of the relevant cryptoassets, or of property which they represent, by unlawful conduct, (b) the relevant cryptoassets the applicant was deprived of were not, immediately before the applicant was deprived of them, recoverable property, and (c) the relevant cryptoassets belonged to the applicant immediately before— (i) the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or (ii) the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet in which the relevant cryptoassets were held. (6) If subsection (7) applies, the relevant court may order the converted cryptoassets to which the application relates to be released to the applicant or to the person from whom the relevant cryptoassets were seized. (7) This subsection applies where— (a) the applicant is not the person from whom the relevant cryptoassets were seized, (b) it appears to the relevant court that the relevant cryptoassets belonged to the applicant immediately before— (i) the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or (ii) the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet in which the relevant cryptoassets were held, (c) the relevant court is satisfied that the release condition is met in relation to the converted cryptoassets, and (d) no objection to the making of an order under subsection (6) has been made by the person from whom the relevant cryptoassets were seized. (8) The release condition is met— (a) if the conditions in this Chapter for the detention of the converted cryptoassets are no longer met, or (b) in relation to converted cryptoassets which are subject to an application for forfeiture under section 303Z60, if the court or sheriff decides not to make an order under that section in relation to the converted cryptoassets. (9) Where subsection (2)(b) applies, references in this section to a person from whom relevant cryptoassets were seized include a reference to a person by or for whom the crypto wallet mentioned in that provision was administered immediately before the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet. (10) In this section “the relevant cryptoassets” means— (a) in relation to converted cryptoassets detained under section 303Z57, some or all of the cryptoassets mentioned in subsection (1) of that section, and (b) in relation to converted cryptoassets detained under section 303Z58, some or all of the cryptoassets mentioned in subsection (1) of that section.

Your change, as a redline

303Z63 Victims and other owners

(1) This section applies where converted cryptoassets are detained under this Chapter. (2) Where this section applies, a person (“P”) who claims that the relevant cryptoassets belonged to P immediately before— (a) the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or (b) the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet in which the relevant cryptoassets were held, may apply to the relevant court for some or all of the converted cryptoassets to be released to P. (3) The application may be made in the course of proceedings under section 303Z57, 303Z58 or 303Z60 or at any other time. (4) The relevant court may order the converted cryptoassets to which the application relates to be released to the applicant if it appears to the relevant court that the condition in subsection (5) is met. (5) The condition in this subsection is that— (a) the applicant was deprived of the relevant cryptoassets, or of property which they represent, by unlawful conduct, (b) the relevant cryptoassets the applicant was deprived of were not, immediately before the applicant was deprived of them, recoverable property, and (c) the relevant cryptoassets belonged to the applicant immediately before— (i) the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or (ii) the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet in which the relevant cryptoassets were held. (6) If subsection (7) applies, the relevant court may order the converted cryptoassets to which the application relates to be released to the applicant or to the person from whom the relevant cryptoassets were seized. (7) This subsection applies where— (a) the applicant is not the person from whom the relevant cryptoassets were seized, (b) it appears to the relevant court that the relevant cryptoassets belonged to the applicant immediately before— (i) the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or (ii) the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet in which the relevant cryptoassets were held, (c) the relevant court is satisfied that the release condition is met in relation to the converted cryptoassets, and (d) no objection to the making of an order under subsection (6) has been made by the person from whom the relevant cryptoassets were seized. (8) The release condition is met— (a) if the conditions in this Chapter for the detention of the converted cryptoassets are no longer met, or (b) in relation to converted cryptoassets which are subject to an application for forfeiture under section 303Z60, if the court or sheriff decides not to make an order under that section in relation to the converted cryptoassets. (9) Where subsection (2)(b) applies, references in this section to a person from whom relevant cryptoassets were seized include a reference to a person by or for whom the crypto wallet mentioned in that provision was administered immediately before the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet. (10) In this section “the relevant cryptoassets” means— (a) in relation to converted cryptoassets detained under section 303Z57, some or all of the cryptoassets mentioned in subsection (1) of that section, and (b) in relation to converted cryptoassets detained under section 303Z58, some or all of the cryptoassets mentioned in subsection (1) of that section.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds