Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

337 Protected disclosures

(1) A disclosure which satisfies the following three conditions is not to be taken to breach any restriction on the disclosure of information (however imposed). (2) The first condition is that the information or other matter disclosed came to the person making the disclosure (the discloser) in the course of his trade, profession, business or employment. (3) The second condition is that the information or other matter— (a) causes the discloser to know or suspect, or (b) gives him reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting, that another person is engaged in money laundering. (4) The third condition is that the disclosure is made to a constable, a customs officer or a nominated officer as soon as is practicable after the information or other matter comes to the discloser. (4A) Where a disclosure consists of a disclosure protected under subsection (1) and a disclosure of either or both of— (a) the identity of the other person mentioned in subsection (3), and (b) the whereabouts of property forming the subject-matter of the money laundering that the discloser knows or suspects, or has reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting, that other person to be engaged in, the disclosure of the thing mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) (as well as the disclosure protected under subsection (1)) is not to be taken to breach any restriction on the disclosure of information (however imposed). (5) A disclosure to a nominated officer is a disclosure which— (a) is made to a person nominated by the discloser’s employer to receive disclosures undersection 330 or this section, and (b) is made in the course of the discloser’s employment ....

Your change, as a redline

337 Protected disclosures

(1) A disclosure which satisfies the following three conditions is not to be taken to breach any restriction on the disclosure of information (however imposed). (2) The first condition is that the information or other matter disclosed came to the person making the disclosure (the discloser) in the course of his trade, profession, business or employment. (3) The second condition is that the information or other matter— (a) causes the discloser to know or suspect, or (b) gives him reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting, that another person is engaged in money laundering. (4) The third condition is that the disclosure is made to a constable, a customs officer or a nominated officer as soon as is practicable after the information or other matter comes to the discloser. (4A) Where a disclosure consists of a disclosure protected under subsection (1) and a disclosure of either or both of— (a) the identity of the other person mentioned in subsection (3), and (b) the whereabouts of property forming the subject-matter of the money laundering that the discloser knows or suspects, or has reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting, that other person to be engaged in, the disclosure of the thing mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) (as well as the disclosure protected under subsection (1)) is not to be taken to breach any restriction on the disclosure of information (however imposed). (5) A disclosure to a nominated officer is a disclosure which— (a) is made to a person nominated by the discloser’s employer to receive disclosures undersection 330 or this section, and (b) is made in the course of the discloser’s employment ....

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds