Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

361 Further provisions

(1) A disclosure order does not confer the right to require a person to answer any privileged question, provide any privileged information or produce any privileged document, except that a lawyer may be required to provide the name and address of a client of his. (2) A privileged question is a question which the person would be entitled to refuse to answer on grounds of legal professional privilege in proceedings in the High Court. (3) Privileged information is any information which the person would be entitled to refuse to provide on grounds of legal professional privilege in proceedings in the High Court. (4) Privileged material is any material which the person would be entitled to refuse to produce on grounds of legal professional privilege in proceedings in the High Court. (5) A disclosure order does not confer the right to require a person to produce excluded material. (6) A disclosure order has effect in spite of any restriction on the disclosure of information (however imposed). (7) An appropriate officer may take copies of any documents produced in compliance with a requirement to produce them which is imposed under a disclosure order. (8) Documents so produced may be retained for so long as it is necessary to retain them (as opposed to a copy of them) in connection with the investigation for the purposes of which the order was made. (9) But if an appropriate officer has reasonable grounds for believing that— (a) the documents may need to be produced for the purposes of any legal proceedings, and (b) they might otherwise be unavailable for those purposes, they may be retained until the proceedings are concluded.

Your change, as a redline

361 Further provisions

(1) A disclosure order does not confer the right to require a person to answer any privileged question, provide any privileged information or produce any privileged document, except that a lawyer may be required to provide the name and address of a client of his. (2) A privileged question is a question which the person would be entitled to refuse to answer on grounds of legal professional privilege in proceedings in the High Court. (3) Privileged information is any information which the person would be entitled to refuse to provide on grounds of legal professional privilege in proceedings in the High Court. (4) Privileged material is any material which the person would be entitled to refuse to produce on grounds of legal professional privilege in proceedings in the High Court. (5) A disclosure order does not confer the right to require a person to produce excluded material. (6) A disclosure order has effect in spite of any restriction on the disclosure of information (however imposed). (7) An appropriate officer may take copies of any documents produced in compliance with a requirement to produce them which is imposed under a disclosure order. (8) Documents so produced may be retained for so long as it is necessary to retain them (as opposed to a copy of them) in connection with the investigation for the purposes of which the order was made. (9) But if an appropriate officer has reasonable grounds for believing that— (a) the documents may need to be produced for the purposes of any legal proceedings, and (b) they might otherwise be unavailable for those purposes, they may be retained until the proceedings are concluded.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds