Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

394 Statements

(1) A statement made by a person in response to a requirement imposed on him under a disclosure order may not be used in evidence against him in criminal proceedings. (2) But subsection (1) does not apply— (a) in the case of proceedings under Part 3, (b) on a prosecution for an offence under section 393(1) or (3), (c) on a prosecution for perjury, or (d) on a prosecution for some other offence where, in giving evidence, the person makes a statement inconsistent with the statement mentioned in subsection (1). (3) A statement may not be used by virtue of subsection (2)(d) against a person unless— (a) evidence relating to it is adduced, or (b) a question relating to it is asked, by him or on his behalf in the proceedings arising out of the prosecution.

Your change, as a redline

394 Statements

(1) A statement made by a person in response to a requirement imposed on him under a disclosure order may not be used in evidence against him in criminal proceedings. (2) But subsection (1) does not apply— (a) in the case of proceedings under Part 3, (b) on a prosecution for an offence under section 393(1) or (3), (c) on a prosecution for perjury, or (d) on a prosecution for some other offence where, in giving evidence, the person makes a statement inconsistent with the statement mentioned in subsection (1). (3) A statement may not be used by virtue of subsection (2)(d) against a person unless— (a) evidence relating to it is adduced, or (b) a question relating to it is asked, by him or on his behalf in the proceedings arising out of the prosecution.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds