Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

396B Requirements for making of unexplained wealth order

(1) These are the requirements for the making of an unexplained wealth order in respect of any property. (2) The Court of Session must be satisfied that there is reasonable cause to believe that— (a) the respondent holds the property, and (b) the value of the property is greater than £50,000. (3) The Court of Session must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting — (a) that the known sources of the respondent's lawfully obtained income would have been insufficient for the purposes of enabling the respondent to obtain the property, or (b) that the property has been obtained through unlawful conduct (within the meaning given by section 242). (4) The Court of Session must be satisfied that— (a) the respondent is a politically exposed person, or (b) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that— (i) the respondent is, or has been, involved in serious crime (whether in a part of the United Kingdom or elsewhere), or (ii) a person connected with the respondent is, or has been, so involved. (5) It does not matter for the purposes of subsection (2)(a)— (a) whether or not there are other persons who also hold the property; (b) whether the property was obtained by the respondent before or after the coming into force of this section. (6) For the purposes of subsection (3)— (a) regard is to be had to any heritable security, charge or other kind of security that it is reasonable to assume was or may have been available to the respondent for the purposes of obtaining the property; (b) it is to be assumed that the respondent obtained the property for a price equivalent to its market value; (c) income is “lawfully obtained” if it is obtained lawfully under the laws of the country from where the income arises; (d) “known” sources of the respondent's income are the sources of income (whether arising from employment, assets or otherwise) that are reasonably ascertainable from available information at the time of the making of the application for the order; (e) where the property is an interest in other property comprised in a settlement, the reference to the respondent obtaining the property is to be taken as if it were a reference to the respondent obtaining direct ownership of such share in the settled property as relates to, or is fairly represented by, that interest. (7) In subsection (4)(a), “politically exposed person” means a person who is— (a) an individual who is, or has been, entrusted with prominent public functions by an international organisation or by a State other than — (i) the United Kingdom, or (ii) an EEA state, (b) a family member of a person within paragraph (a), (c) known to be a close associate of a person within that paragraph, or (d) otherwise connected with a person within that paragraph. (8) Article 3 of Directive 2015/849/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 applies for the purposes of determining— (a) whether a person has been entrusted with prominent public functions (see point (9) of that Article), (b) whether a person is a family member (see point (10) of that Article), and (c) whether a person is known to be a close associate of another (see point (11) of that Article). (9) For the purposes of this section— (a) a person is involved in serious crime in a part of the United Kingdom or elsewhere if the person would be so involved for the purposes of Part 1 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 (see in particular sections 2, 2A and 3 of that Act); (b) section 1122 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 (“connected” persons) applies in determining whether a person is connected with another. (10) Where the property in respect of which the order is sought comprises more than one item of property, the reference in subsection (2)(b) to the value of the property is to the total value of those items.

Your change, as a redline

396B Requirements for making of unexplained wealth order

(1) These are the requirements for the making of an unexplained wealth order in respect of any property. (2) The Court of Session must be satisfied that there is reasonable cause to believe that— (a) the respondent holds the property, and (b) the value of the property is greater than £50,000. (3) The Court of Session must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting — (a) that the known sources of the respondent's lawfully obtained income would have been insufficient for the purposes of enabling the respondent to obtain the property, or (b) that the property has been obtained through unlawful conduct (within the meaning given by section 242). (4) The Court of Session must be satisfied that— (a) the respondent is a politically exposed person, or (b) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that— (i) the respondent is, or has been, involved in serious crime (whether in a part of the United Kingdom or elsewhere), or (ii) a person connected with the respondent is, or has been, so involved. (5) It does not matter for the purposes of subsection (2)(a)— (a) whether or not there are other persons who also hold the property; (b) whether the property was obtained by the respondent before or after the coming into force of this section. (6) For the purposes of subsection (3)— (a) regard is to be had to any heritable security, charge or other kind of security that it is reasonable to assume was or may have been available to the respondent for the purposes of obtaining the property; (b) it is to be assumed that the respondent obtained the property for a price equivalent to its market value; (c) income is “lawfully obtained” if it is obtained lawfully under the laws of the country from where the income arises; (d) “known” sources of the respondent's income are the sources of income (whether arising from employment, assets or otherwise) that are reasonably ascertainable from available information at the time of the making of the application for the order; (e) where the property is an interest in other property comprised in a settlement, the reference to the respondent obtaining the property is to be taken as if it were a reference to the respondent obtaining direct ownership of such share in the settled property as relates to, or is fairly represented by, that interest. (7) In subsection (4)(a), “politically exposed person” means a person who is— (a) an individual who is, or has been, entrusted with prominent public functions by an international organisation or by a State other than — (i) the United Kingdom, or (ii) an EEA state, (b) a family member of a person within paragraph (a), (c) known to be a close associate of a person within that paragraph, or (d) otherwise connected with a person within that paragraph. (8) Article 3 of Directive 2015/849/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 applies for the purposes of determining— (a) whether a person has been entrusted with prominent public functions (see point (9) of that Article), (b) whether a person is a family member (see point (10) of that Article), and (c) whether a person is known to be a close associate of another (see point (11) of that Article). (9) For the purposes of this section— (a) a person is involved in serious crime in a part of the United Kingdom or elsewhere if the person would be so involved for the purposes of Part 1 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 (see in particular sections 2, 2A and 3 of that Act); (b) section 1122 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 (“connected” persons) applies in determining whether a person is connected with another. (10) Where the property in respect of which the order is sought comprises more than one item of property, the reference in subsection (2)(b) to the value of the property is to the total value of those items.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds