Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

449 NCA officers: pseudonyms

(1) This section applies to a National Crime Agency officer if— (a) he is assigned to do anything on behalf of the National Crime Agency for the purposes of this Act, and (b) it is necessary or expedient for the purpose of doing the thing for the National Crime Agency officer to identify himself by name. (2) An authorised person may direct that such a National Crime Agency officer may for that purpose identify himself by means of a pseudonym. (3) For the purposes of any proceedings or application under this Act a certificate signed by an authorised person which sufficiently identifies the National Crime Agency officer by reference to the pseudonym is conclusive evidence that that National Crime Agency officer is authorised to use the pseudonym. (4) In any proceedings or application under this Act a National Crime Agency officer in respect of whom a direction under this section is in force must not be asked (and if asked is not required to answer) any question which is likely to reveal his true identity. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) In this section “authorised person” means an NCA officer authorised by the Director General of the NCA for the purposes of this section.

Your change, as a redline

449 NCA officers: pseudonyms

(1) This section applies to a National Crime Agency officer if— (a) he is assigned to do anything on behalf of the National Crime Agency for the purposes of this Act, and (b) it is necessary or expedient for the purpose of doing the thing for the National Crime Agency officer to identify himself by name. (2) An authorised person may direct that such a National Crime Agency officer may for that purpose identify himself by means of a pseudonym. (3) For the purposes of any proceedings or application under this Act a certificate signed by an authorised person which sufficiently identifies the National Crime Agency officer by reference to the pseudonym is conclusive evidence that that National Crime Agency officer is authorised to use the pseudonym. (4) In any proceedings or application under this Act a National Crime Agency officer in respect of whom a direction under this section is in force must not be asked (and if asked is not required to answer) any question which is likely to reveal his true identity. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) In this section “authorised person” means an NCA officer authorised by the Director General of the NCA for the purposes of this section.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds