Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

451 Revenue and Customs prosecutions

(1) Proceedings for a specified offence may be started by the Director of Public Prosecutions or by order of the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (the Commissioners). (2) Where proceedings under subsection (1) are instituted by the Commissioners, the proceedings must be brought in the name of an officer of Revenue and Customs. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) If the Commissioners investigate, or propose to investigate, any matter to help them to decide— (a) whether there are grounds for believing that a specified offence has been committed, or (b) whether a person is to be prosecuted for such an offence, the matter must be treated as an assigned matter within the meaning of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (c. 2). (5) This section— (a) does not prevent any person (including a officer of Revenue and Customs) who has power to arrest, detain or prosecute a person for a specified offence from doing so; (b) does not prevent a court from dealing with a person brought before it following his arrest by a officer of Revenue and Customs for a specified offence, even if the proceedings were not started by an order under subsection (1). (6) The following are specified offences— (a) an offence under Part 7; (b) an offence under section 342; (c) an attempt, conspiracy or incitement to commit an offence specified in paragraph (a) or (b); (d) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the commission of an offence specified in paragraph (a) or (b). (7) This section does not apply to proceedings on indictment in Scotland.

Your change, as a redline

451 Revenue and Customs prosecutions

(1) Proceedings for a specified offence may be started by the Director of Public Prosecutions or by order of the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (the Commissioners). (2) Where proceedings under subsection (1) are instituted by the Commissioners, the proceedings must be brought in the name of an officer of Revenue and Customs. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) If the Commissioners investigate, or propose to investigate, any matter to help them to decide— (a) whether there are grounds for believing that a specified offence has been committed, or (b) whether a person is to be prosecuted for such an offence, the matter must be treated as an assigned matter within the meaning of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (c. 2). (5) This section— (a) does not prevent any person (including a officer of Revenue and Customs) who has power to arrest, detain or prosecute a person for a specified offence from doing so; (b) does not prevent a court from dealing with a person brought before it following his arrest by a officer of Revenue and Customs for a specified offence, even if the proceedings were not started by an order under subsection (1). (6) The following are specified offences— (a) an offence under Part 7; (b) an offence under section 342; (c) an attempt, conspiracy or incitement to commit an offence specified in paragraph (a) or (b); (d) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the commission of an offence specified in paragraph (a) or (b). (7) This section does not apply to proceedings on indictment in Scotland.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds