Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

72 Serious default

(1) If the following three conditions are satisfied the Crown Court may order the payment of such compensation as it believes is just. (2) The first condition is satisfied if a criminal investigation has been started with regard to an offence and proceedings are not started for the offence. (3) The first condition is also satisfied if proceedings for an offence are started against a person and— (a) they do not result in his conviction for the offence, or (b) he is convicted of the offence but the conviction is quashed or he is pardoned in respect of it. (4) If subsection (2) applies the second condition is that— (a) in the criminal investigation there has been a serious default by a person mentioned in subsection (9), and (b) the investigation would not have continued if the default had not occurred. (5) If subsection (3) applies the second condition is that— (a) in the criminal investigation with regard to the offence or in its prosecution there has been a serious default by a person who is mentioned in subsection (9), and (b) the proceedings would not have been started or continued if the default had not occurred. (6) The third condition is that an application is made under this section by a person who held realisable property and has suffered loss in consequence of anything done in relation to it by or in pursuance of an order under this Part. (7) The offence referred to in subsection (2) may be one of a number of offences with regard to which the investigation is started. (8) The offence referred to in subsection (3) may be one of a number of offences for which the proceedings are started. (9) Compensation under this section is payable to the applicant and— (a) if the person in default was or was acting as a member of a police force, the compensation is payable out of the police fund from which the expenses of that force are met; (b) if the person in default was a member of the Crown Prosecution Service or was acting on its behalf, the compensation is payable by the Director of Public Prosecutions; (ba) if the person in default was a National Crime Agency officer, the compensation is payable by the National Crime Agency; (c) if the person in default was a member of the Serious Fraud Office, the compensation is payable by the Director of that Office; (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) if the person in default was an officer of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue, the compensation is payable by those Commissioners. (ea) if the person in default was an immigration officer, the compensation is payable by the Secretary of State; (f) if the person in default was an accredited financial investigator and none of paragraphs (a) to (e) apply, the compensation is payable in accordance with paragraph (a), (c) , (da) or (e) of section 302(7A) (as the case may require).

Your change, as a redline

72 Serious default

(1) If the following three conditions are satisfied the Crown Court may order the payment of such compensation as it believes is just. (2) The first condition is satisfied if a criminal investigation has been started with regard to an offence and proceedings are not started for the offence. (3) The first condition is also satisfied if proceedings for an offence are started against a person and— (a) they do not result in his conviction for the offence, or (b) he is convicted of the offence but the conviction is quashed or he is pardoned in respect of it. (4) If subsection (2) applies the second condition is that— (a) in the criminal investigation there has been a serious default by a person mentioned in subsection (9), and (b) the investigation would not have continued if the default had not occurred. (5) If subsection (3) applies the second condition is that— (a) in the criminal investigation with regard to the offence or in its prosecution there has been a serious default by a person who is mentioned in subsection (9), and (b) the proceedings would not have been started or continued if the default had not occurred. (6) The third condition is that an application is made under this section by a person who held realisable property and has suffered loss in consequence of anything done in relation to it by or in pursuance of an order under this Part. (7) The offence referred to in subsection (2) may be one of a number of offences with regard to which the investigation is started. (8) The offence referred to in subsection (3) may be one of a number of offences for which the proceedings are started. (9) Compensation under this section is payable to the applicant and— (a) if the person in default was or was acting as a member of a police force, the compensation is payable out of the police fund from which the expenses of that force are met; (b) if the person in default was a member of the Crown Prosecution Service or was acting on its behalf, the compensation is payable by the Director of Public Prosecutions; (ba) if the person in default was a National Crime Agency officer, the compensation is payable by the National Crime Agency; (c) if the person in default was a member of the Serious Fraud Office, the compensation is payable by the Director of that Office; (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) if the person in default was an officer of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue, the compensation is payable by those Commissioners. (ea) if the person in default was an immigration officer, the compensation is payable by the Secretary of State; (f) if the person in default was an accredited financial investigator and none of paragraphs (a) to (e) apply, the compensation is payable in accordance with paragraph (a), (c) , (da) or (e) of section 302(7A) (as the case may require).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds