Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

96 Assumptions to be made in case of criminal lifestyle

(1) Where the court decides under section 92 that the accused has a criminal lifestyle it must make the following four assumptions for the purpose of— (a) deciding whether he has benefited from his general criminal conduct, and (b) deciding his benefit from the conduct. (2) The first assumption is that any property transferred to the accused at any time after the relevant day was obtained by him— (a) as a result of his general criminal conduct, and (b) at the earliest time he appears to have held it. (3) The second assumption is that any property held by the accused at any time after the date of conviction was obtained by him— (a) as a result of his general criminal conduct, and (b) at the earliest time he appears to have held it. (4) The third assumption is that any expenditure incurred by the accused at any time after the relevant day was met from property obtained by him as a result of his general criminal conduct. (5) The fourth assumption is that, for the purpose of valuing any property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by the accused, he obtained it free of any other interests in it. (6) But the court must not make any of those assumptions in relation to particular property or expenditure if— (a) the assumption is shown to be incorrect, or (b) there would be a serious risk of injustice if the assumption were made. (7) If the court does not make one or more of those assumptions it must state its reasons. (8) The relevant day is the first day of the period of six years ending with— (a) the day when proceedings for the offence concerned were instituted against the accused, or (b) if there are two or more offences and proceedings for them were instituted on different days, the earliest of those days. (9) But if a confiscation order mentioned in section 94(3)(c) has been made against the accused at any time during the period mentioned in subsection (8)— (a) the relevant day is the day when the accused’s benefit was calculated for the purposes of the last such confiscation order; (b) the second assumption does not apply to any property which was held by him on or before the relevant day. (10) The date of conviction is— (a) the date on which the accused was convicted of the offence concerned, or (b) if there are two or more offences and the convictions are on different dates, the date of the latest.

Your change, as a redline

96 Assumptions to be made in case of criminal lifestyle

(1) Where the court decides under section 92 that the accused has a criminal lifestyle it must make the following four assumptions for the purpose of— (a) deciding whether he has benefited from his general criminal conduct, and (b) deciding his benefit from the conduct. (2) The first assumption is that any property transferred to the accused at any time after the relevant day was obtained by him— (a) as a result of his general criminal conduct, and (b) at the earliest time he appears to have held it. (3) The second assumption is that any property held by the accused at any time after the date of conviction was obtained by him— (a) as a result of his general criminal conduct, and (b) at the earliest time he appears to have held it. (4) The third assumption is that any expenditure incurred by the accused at any time after the relevant day was met from property obtained by him as a result of his general criminal conduct. (5) The fourth assumption is that, for the purpose of valuing any property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by the accused, he obtained it free of any other interests in it. (6) But the court must not make any of those assumptions in relation to particular property or expenditure if— (a) the assumption is shown to be incorrect, or (b) there would be a serious risk of injustice if the assumption were made. (7) If the court does not make one or more of those assumptions it must state its reasons. (8) The relevant day is the first day of the period of six years ending with— (a) the day when proceedings for the offence concerned were instituted against the accused, or (b) if there are two or more offences and proceedings for them were instituted on different days, the earliest of those days. (9) But if a confiscation order mentioned in section 94(3)(c) has been made against the accused at any time during the period mentioned in subsection (8)— (a) the relevant day is the day when the accused’s benefit was calculated for the purposes of the last such confiscation order; (b) the second assumption does not apply to any property which was held by him on or before the relevant day. (10) The date of conviction is— (a) the date on which the accused was convicted of the offence concerned, or (b) if there are two or more offences and the convictions are on different dates, the date of the latest.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds