Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

97C Breach of compliance order

(1) This section applies where— (a) a compliance order has been made in relation to an accused, and (b) it appears to the court that the accused has failed to comply with the compliance order. (2) The court may— (a) issue a warrant for the accused's arrest, or (b) issue a citation to the accused requiring the accused to appear before the court. (3) If the accused fails to appear as required by a citation issued under subsection (2)(b), the court may issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused. (4) The unified citation provisions (as defined in section 307(1) of the Procedure Act) apply in relation to a citation under subsection (2)(b). (5) The court must, before considering the alleged failure— (a) provide the accused with written details of the alleged failure, (b) inform the accused that the accused is entitled to be legally represented, and (c) inform the accused that no answer need be given to the allegation before the accused— (i) has been given an opportunity to take legal advice, or (ii) has indicated that the accused does not wish to take legal advice. (6) If the court is satisfied that the accused has failed without reasonable excuse to comply with the compliance order, the court may— (a) impose on the accused a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale, (b) revoke the compliance order and impose on the accused a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months, (c) vary the compliance order, or (d) both impose a fine under paragraph (a) and vary the order under paragraph (c). (7) The court may vary the compliance order if the court is satisfied— (a) that the accused has failed to comply with the order, (b) that the accused had a reasonable excuse for the failure, and (c) that, having regard to the circumstances which have arisen since the order was imposed, it is in the interests of justice to vary the order. (8) Evidence of one witness is sufficient for the purpose of establishing that an accused has failed without reasonable excuse to comply with a compliance order.

Your change, as a redline

97C Breach of compliance order

(1) This section applies where— (a) a compliance order has been made in relation to an accused, and (b) it appears to the court that the accused has failed to comply with the compliance order. (2) The court may— (a) issue a warrant for the accused's arrest, or (b) issue a citation to the accused requiring the accused to appear before the court. (3) If the accused fails to appear as required by a citation issued under subsection (2)(b), the court may issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused. (4) The unified citation provisions (as defined in section 307(1) of the Procedure Act) apply in relation to a citation under subsection (2)(b). (5) The court must, before considering the alleged failure— (a) provide the accused with written details of the alleged failure, (b) inform the accused that the accused is entitled to be legally represented, and (c) inform the accused that no answer need be given to the allegation before the accused— (i) has been given an opportunity to take legal advice, or (ii) has indicated that the accused does not wish to take legal advice. (6) If the court is satisfied that the accused has failed without reasonable excuse to comply with the compliance order, the court may— (a) impose on the accused a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale, (b) revoke the compliance order and impose on the accused a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months, (c) vary the compliance order, or (d) both impose a fine under paragraph (a) and vary the order under paragraph (c). (7) The court may vary the compliance order if the court is satisfied— (a) that the accused has failed to comply with the order, (b) that the accused had a reasonable excuse for the failure, and (c) that, having regard to the circumstances which have arisen since the order was imposed, it is in the interests of justice to vary the order. (8) Evidence of one witness is sufficient for the purpose of establishing that an accused has failed without reasonable excuse to comply with a compliance order.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds