Propose a change

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

9A Hidden property

(1) This section applies where it appears to a court calculating the available amount that— (a) the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned exceeds the total of the values (as at the time the confiscation order is made) of— (i) all the free property then held by the defendant, and (ii) all tainted gifts, and (b) some or all of that excess is a result of property having been hidden by or on behalf of the defendant. (2) The court must determine the total value of the property that the court considers has been hidden by or on behalf of the defendant. (3) When making a determination under this section the court must, in particular, consider the extent to which there are other circumstances that may account for the excess mentioned in subsection (1)(b), for example— (a) expenditure incurred by the defendant which has or may have been met from the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned; (b) changes in the value of the property held by the defendant.

Your change, as a redline

9A Hidden property

(1) This section applies where it appears to a court calculating the available amount that— (a) the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned exceeds the total of the values (as at the time the confiscation order is made) of— (i) all the free property then held by the defendant, and (ii) all tainted gifts, and (b) some or all of that excess is a result of property having been hidden by or on behalf of the defendant. (2) The court must determine the total value of the property that the court considers has been hidden by or on behalf of the defendant. (3) When making a determination under this section the court must, in particular, consider the extent to which there are other circumstances that may account for the excess mentioned in subsection (1)(b), for example— (a) expenditure incurred by the defendant which has or may have been met from the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned; (b) changes in the value of the property held by the defendant.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds