The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) (Amendment) Order 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Amendment of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) Order 2003
(1) The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) Order 2003 is amended as follows. (2) After article 10 (provision of facilities for French officers), insert— Circulation Areas 10A (1) In this article “Circulation Area” means the part of a port in the United Kingdom designated in Schedule 1 to this Order within which the officers belonging to the French Republic are authorised to travel between Control Zones. (2) An officer belonging to the French Republic may escort a person detained under article 4 within a Circulation Area in order to access a Control Zone. (3) Articles 6 and 8(1) and (2) of this Order apply to an officer belonging to the French Republic while escorting a person under paragraph (2) as if for “Control Zone”, each time it occurs, there were substituted “Circulation Area”. (4) Articles 3(2) to (4), 7 and 9 of this Order apply to an officer belonging to the French Republic within a Circulation Area, as if— (a) for “Control Zone”, each time it occurs, there were substituted “Circulation Area”; (b) in article 3(2) to (4) (exercise of functions by French officers), for “carrying out his functions in accordance with paragraph (1)”, each time it occurs, there were substituted “escorting a person under article 10A(2)”; (c) in article 7 (arrest of a French officer), for “in the exercise of his functions” in paragraph (2) there were substituted “escorting a person under article 10A(2)”. .
2 Amendment of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) Order 2003
(1) The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) Order 2003 is amended as follows. (2) After article 10 (provision of facilities for French officers), insert— Circulation Areas 10A (1) In this article “Circulation Area” means the part of a port in the United Kingdom designated in Schedule 1 to this Order within which the officers belonging to the French Republic are authorised to travel between Control Zones. (2) An officer belonging to the French Republic may escort a person detained under article 4 within a Circulation Area in order to access a Control Zone. (3) Articles 6 and 8(1) and (2) of this Order apply to an officer belonging to the French Republic while escorting a person under paragraph (2) as if for “Control Zone”, each time it occurs, there were substituted “Circulation Area”. (4) Articles 3(2) to (4), 7 and 9 of this Order apply to an officer belonging to the French Republic within a Circulation Area, as if— (a) for “Control Zone”, each time it occurs, there were substituted “Circulation Area”; (b) in article 3(2) to (4) (exercise of functions by French officers), for “carrying out his functions in accordance with paragraph (1)”, each time it occurs, there were substituted “escorting a person under article 10A(2)”; (c) in article 7 (arrest of a French officer), for “in the exercise of his functions” in paragraph (2) there were substituted “escorting a person under article 10A(2)”. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.