Finance (No. 3) Act 2010
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
13 R&D relief for SMEs: removal of intellectual property condition
(1) Part 13 of CTA 2009 (additional relief for expenditure on research and development) is amended as follows. (2) In section 1052 (qualifying expenditure on in-house direct R&D)— (a) in subsection (1), for “conditions A to E” substitute “ conditions A, B, D and E ”, and (b) omit subsection (4) (condition C: intellectual property created as result of research and development to which expenditure is attributable to be vested in company). (3) In section 1053 (qualifying expenditure on contracted out R&D)— (a) in subsection (1)(b), for “conditions A to D” substitute “ conditions A, C and D ”, and (b) omit subsection (3) (condition B: same intellectual property condition). (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) Omit section 1139 (meaning of “intellectual property”). (7) In Schedule 4 to CTA 2009 (index of defined expressions), omit the entry relating to “intellectual property (in Part 13)”. (8) The amendments made by this section have effect in relation to expenditure incurred by a company in an accounting period ending on or after 9 December 2009.
13 R&D relief for SMEs: removal of intellectual property condition
(1) Part 13 of CTA 2009 (additional relief for expenditure on research and development) is amended as follows. (2) In section 1052 (qualifying expenditure on in-house direct R&D)— (a) in subsection (1), for “conditions A to E” substitute “ conditions A, B, D and E ”, and (b) omit subsection (4) (condition C: intellectual property created as result of research and development to which expenditure is attributable to be vested in company). (3) In section 1053 (qualifying expenditure on contracted out R&D)— (a) in subsection (1)(b), for “conditions A to D” substitute “ conditions A, C and D ”, and (b) omit subsection (3) (condition B: same intellectual property condition). (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) Omit section 1139 (meaning of “intellectual property”). (7) In Schedule 4 to CTA 2009 (index of defined expressions), omit the entry relating to “intellectual property (in Part 13)”. (8) The amendments made by this section have effect in relation to expenditure incurred by a company in an accounting period ending on or after 9 December 2009.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.