The Electronic Communications (Networks and Services) (Designated Vendor Directions) (Penalties) Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Amendment of the Electronic Communications (Networks and Services) (Penalties) (Rules for Calculation of Turnover) Order 2003
(1) The Electronic Communications (Networks and Services) (Penalties) (Rules for Calculation of Turnover) Order 2003 is amended as follows. (2) In article 2 (interpretation)— (a) omit “and” at the end of the definition of “the Act”; (b) omit the definition of “notified provider”. (3) In article 3 (rules for calculation of turnover for the purposes of section 97) for “notified provider’s” substitute “person’s”. (4) In the Schedule (rules for calculation of turnover for purposes of section 97)— (a) in paragraph 1, for “The turnover of a notified provider” substitute “A person’s turnover”; (b) in paragraph 2— (i) for “The turnover of a notified provider” substitute “A person’s turnover”; (ii) for “that provider” substitute “that person”; (c) in paragraph 3, for “notified provider’s” substitute “person’s”; (d) in the heading to paragraph 4, omit “to a notified provider”; (e) in paragraph 4(1)— (i) for “notified provider”, in both places it occurs, substitute “person”; (ii) for “that provider’s” substitute “that person’s”; (iii) for “that provider” substitute “that person”.
3 Amendment of the Electronic Communications (Networks and Services) (Penalties) (Rules for Calculation of Turnover) Order 2003
(1) The Electronic Communications (Networks and Services) (Penalties) (Rules for Calculation of Turnover) Order 2003 is amended as follows. (2) In article 2 (interpretation)— (a) omit “and” at the end of the definition of “the Act”; (b) omit the definition of “notified provider”. (3) In article 3 (rules for calculation of turnover for the purposes of section 97) for “notified provider’s” substitute “person’s”. (4) In the Schedule (rules for calculation of turnover for purposes of section 97)— (a) in paragraph 1, for “The turnover of a notified provider” substitute “A person’s turnover”; (b) in paragraph 2— (i) for “The turnover of a notified provider” substitute “A person’s turnover”; (ii) for “that provider” substitute “that person”; (c) in paragraph 3, for “notified provider’s” substitute “person’s”; (d) in the heading to paragraph 4, omit “to a notified provider”; (e) in paragraph 4(1)— (i) for “notified provider”, in both places it occurs, substitute “person”; (ii) for “that provider’s” substitute “that person’s”; (iii) for “that provider” substitute “that person”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.